Hugh E. Nortonis Chairman of the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee and is a member of the Management Personnel Committee of Gray’s ~~Board of Directors.~~Board. Mr. Norton has been President of Norco Holdings, Inc., an insurance agency, since 1973 and also is a real estate developer in Destin, Florida. Prior to that, he was Regional Manager of Security Insurance Group where he served for 15 years. Mr. Norton brings to the Board ~~of Directors~~ a wealth of business experience based on his many years of service as an executive, as well as a unique perspective based on the regulatory and local government issues he faces as a developer. As the director with the longest tenure on our Board, ~~of Directors,~~ he also serves as an ongoing source for industry-specific knowledge.

Harriett J. Robinsonhas been a director of Atlantic American Corporation since 1989. Mrs. Robinson has also been a director of Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire and Casualty Insurance Company since 1967. Mrs. Robinson is the wife of Mr. J. Mack Robinson and the mother-in-law of Mr. Hilton H. Howell, Jr., both current members of Gray’s Board, and the mother of ~~Directors.~~Mrs. Howell. Mrs. Robinson’s active service on our Board ~~of Directors~~ and on the boards of several other companies for a number of years provides capable leadership and a familiarity with the operational issues facing organizations in today’s business climate. She lends a diverse voice to the ~~Board of Directors’~~Board’s deliberations, and her civic involvement and philanthropic activities provide a critical link to the community, particularly to women in business.

PROPOSAL 2

APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

2007 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

We are asking our shareholders to approve amendment No. 1 (“Amendment No. 1”) to the Gray Television, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2007 Incentive Plan”) and, as part of that approval, to reapprove the material terms for performance-based awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan. The version of the 2007 Incentive Plan that was in effect prior to Amendment No. 1 was adopted by our board of directors on March 14, 2007 and approved by our shareholders on May 2, 2007.

On April 2, 2012, the board of directors approved Amendment No. 1, which generally makes the following changes to such plan: (1) provides that nonemployee directors of Gray and every subsidiary of Gray shall be eligible to participate in the 2007 Incentive Plan as participants and (2) adds a “no repricing” provision.

If the shareholders approve the Amendment No. 1, the 2007 Incentive Plan will allow awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan to be granted to nonemployee directors of Gray and every subsidiary of Gray and will prohibit repricing of stock options and stock appreciation rights.

Approval of Amendment No. 1 will also constitute reapproval by our shareholders of the material terms for performance-based awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan, which is necessary to provide the flexibility for us to make certain awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan that will be tax-deductible by us as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

Section 162(m) of the Code limits the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of compensation in excess of $1 million per year for the chief executive officer and certain other officers, unless such compensation qualifies as performance-based compensation under the Code. Various requirements must be satisfied in order for awards to qualify as performance-based compensation. One requirement is that the material terms relating to such awards must be approved by the shareholders of the public company every five years.

By reapproving the material terms for performance-based awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan, certain awards that could be made under the 2007 Incentive Plan would qualify as performance-based compensation, assuming other conditions are met.

Description of the 2007 Incentive Plan

A summary of the material terms of the 2007 Incentive Plan, as it is proposed to be amended, appears below. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2007 Incentive Plan, as proposed to be amended, which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement.

Purpose. The 2007 Incentive Plan is designed to encourage certain employees (including officers and directors who are also employees) and nonemployee directors of Gray or Gray’s subsidiaries to acquire Gray common stock or Class A common stock or to receive monetary payments based on the value of such stock or upon achieving certain goals on a mutually advantageous basis, thereby strengthening the employees’ and nonemployee directors’ desire to remain with Gray, while simultaneously providing an incentive to work for Gray’s success.

Administration. The 2007 Incentive Plan will be administered by a committee or subcommittee of Gray’s board of directors that consists of no fewer than two members, each of whom is an outside director and a “non-employee” director (the “2007 Plan Committee”). The determinations of the 2007 Plan Committee will be made in accordance with their judgment as to the best interest of Gray and its shareholders and in accordance with the purpose of the 2007 Incentive Plan. Determinations, interpretations or other actions made or taken by the 2007 Plan Committee pursuant to the provisions of the 2007 Incentive Plan will be final and binding and conclusive for all purposes and upon all persons whomsoever. The 2007 Plan Committee may delegate administrative duties to one or more officers or employees of Gray or subsidiaries of Gray to the extent that such delegation would not jeopardize the performance-based exception under Section 162(m) of the Code or otherwise violate applicable law or rules of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Participants. Employees (approximately 2,100 as of March 31, 2012) and nonemployee directors (eight as of March 31, 2012) of Gray or any designated subsidiary who have a major impact on the success and future growth and profitability of Gray, as determined by the 2007 Plan Committee in its sole discretion, are eligible to participate in the 2007 Incentive Plan. A designation as a participant in one year will not require the 2007 Plan Committee to designate such person to receive (1) an award in any other year, (2) the same type of award as granted to the participant in any other year or as granted to any other participant in any year, or (3) the same amount of award as granted to the participant in any other year or as granted to any other participant in any year.

Shares Reserved Under the Plan. The 2007 Incentive Plan allows Gray to issue an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock with not more than 1,000,000 out of that 6,000,000 being Class A common stock. The 6,000,000 maximum includes approximately 2,469,000 shares of stock that were unused shares under the 2002 Long Term Incentive Plan. No new awards are eligible to be made under the 2002 Long Term Incentive Plan. Stock underlying awards under the 2002 Long Term Incentive Plan that expire, are cancelled or are forfeited after May 2, 2007 will not be added back to the 6,000,000 maximum. As of April 2, 2012, an aggregate of 4,461,007 shares were available for future grants under the 2007 Incentive Plan, of which 1,000,000 of such shares may be shares of Class A common stock.

The following awards will be counted against the 6,000,000 maximum: (1) stock underlying outstanding options or performance awards while such options and performance awards are outstanding, (2) the full number of stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) granted that are to be settled in common stock, regardless of the number of shares actually issued upon settlement of such SAR, and (3) restricted stock issued pursuant to the 2007 Incentive Plan while such restricted stock is outstanding even while subject to restrictions. When the exercise price of an option is paid by delivery of shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock, the number of shares available for issuance under the 2007 Incentive Plan shall continue to be reduced by the gross (rather than the net) number of shares issued pursuant to such exercise. Shares underlying expired, canceled or forfeited awards (except restricted stock) may be added back to the 6,000,000 maximum.

Unless and until the 2007 Plan Committee determines that an award to a covered employee shall not be designed to comply with the performance-based exception under Section 162(m) of the Code, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock that may be awarded to any individual in any one fiscal year pursuant to stock options will be 500,000 shares, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock that may be awarded to any individual in any one fiscal year pursuant to SARs will be 500,000 shares, and the maximum aggregate payout to any individual in any one year as to performance awards will be the greater of $1,000,000 or 500,000 shares. Shares related to a cancelled award or an award that is amended

in a way that is treated as a cancellation will count against the maximum limitations for the applicable fiscal year.

Grant of Awards.After the 2007 Plan Committee grants an award to a participant, Gray will notify the participant of such grant and will deliver or mail an award agreement to the participant. The participant must execute and return the award agreement within 30 days after it is mailed or delivered by Gray. If the participant fails to execute and return the award agreement within the 30 day period, his or her award will terminate automatically. However, if the participant dies within the 30 day period, the award agreement will be effective notwithstanding the fact that it has not been signed prior to death.

Types of Awards. The 2007 Incentive Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards, SARs and performance awards (collectively, the “awards”). Except as specifically limited in the 2007 Incentive Plan, the 2007 Plan Committee has complete discretion in determining the type and number of awards to be granted and the terms and conditions of such awards (such terms and conditions need not be uniform as between different participants). The types of awards are described in greater detail below.

Incentive Stock Options. Incentive stock options granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan, which are intended to comply with Section 422 of the Code, may be exercised as provided in the individual award agreements, but in no event later than 10 years from the date of grant. The purchase price per share of Gray common stock or Class A common stock purchasable under any incentive stock option (which may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date the option is granted) will be determined by the 2007 Plan Committee. The purchase price may be paid by check or, in the discretion of the 2007 Plan Committee, by the delivery of shares then owned by the participant. The aggregate fair market value of the stock for which an incentive stock option is exercisable for the first time during any calendar year (under all option plans of Gray and its subsidiary corporations) shall not exceed $100,000 per participant. Only key employees may be granted incentive stock options under the 2007 Incentive Plan.

Upon a termination of employment for any reason (other than death or disability), an incentive stock option will terminate not later than 3 months after such termination (or 3 months after death, if the optionee dies within 3 months after such termination).

Upon a termination of employment as a result of death or disability, an incentive stock option will be exercisable for 12 months after such termination (or the longer of the remainder of the 12-month period or 3 months after death, if the optionee dies within 12 months after a termination as a result of disability).

In no event shall any incentive stock option be exercised more than 10 years after its date of grant.

Nonqualified Stock Options. Nonqualified stock options granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan may be exercised as provided in the individual award agreements, but in no event later than 10 years from the date of grant. The purchase price per share of Gray common stock or Class A common stock purchasable under any nonqualified stock option (which may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date the option is granted) will be determined by the 2007 Plan Committee. The purchase price may be paid by check or, in the discretion of the 2007 Plan Committee, by the delivery of shares then owned by the participant. The 2007 Plan Committee will have the right to determine at the time an option is granted whether shares issued upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option will be subject to restrictions, and if so, the nature of the restrictions.

Unless determined otherwise in the award agreement, upon a termination of employment or service for any reason (other than death, disability or retirement), an option will terminate 3 months after such termination.

Unless determined otherwise in the award agreement, upon a termination of employment or service as a result of death, disability or retirement, an option will terminate 12 months after such termination (or 3 months after death, if the optionee dies within 12 months after termination as a result of retirement or disability).

In no event shall any option be exercised more than 10 years after its date of grant.

Stock Appreciation Rights. A SAR is the right to receive a payment from Gray equal to the excess of the fair market value of a share of Gray common stock or Class A common stock at the date of exercise over the base price (or the exercise price of an option, if the SAR is granted in conjunction with an option). At the discretion of the 2007 Plan Committee, SARs may be granted (1) in lieu of exercise of an option or (2) independent of an option. If the option qualifies as an incentive stock option pursuant to Section 422 of the Code, the related SAR must comply with the applicable provisions of the Code. The base or grant price of each SAR will equal the fair market value of Gray common stock or Class A common stock on the date of grant of the SAR. Payment for SARs may be made in cash or Gray common stock or Class A common stock, or in a combination thereof, at the discretion of the 2007 Plan Committee. In addition, at the time of grant, the 2007 Plan Committee may, in its sole discretion, establish any other conditions on exercise of a SAR. The following will apply upon the exercise of a SAR:

•

Exercise of SARs in Lieu of Exercise of Options. SARs exercisable in lieu of options may be exercised for all or part of the shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock subject to the related option upon the exercise of the right to exercise an equivalent number of options. A SAR may be exercised only with respect to the shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock for which its related option is then exercisable. Such number of shares equal to the number of SARs exercised will no longer be available for exercise under the related option (and when a share of Gray common stock or Class A common stock is purchased under the related option, the related SAR shall similarly no longer be available for exercise).

•

Exercise of SARs Independent of Options. SARs exercisable independent of stock options may be exercised upon whatever terms and conditions the 2007 Plan Committee imposes upon the SARs.

Restricted Stock. Restricted stock consists of Gray common stock or Class A common stock issued or transferred under the 2007 Incentive Plan (other than upon exercise of options or as performance awards) at any purchase price less than the fair market value thereof on the date of issuance or transfer, or as a bonus. The purchase price (if any) will be determined by the 2007 Plan Committee. Participants are entitled to all dividends paid with respect to restricted stock during the period of restriction and will not be required to return any such dividends to Gray in the event of the forfeiture of the restricted stock. Participants will be entitled to vote the restricted stock during the period of restriction. In addition, the restricted stock may be subject to (1) restrictions on the sale or other disposition thereof, (2) rights of Gray to reacquire such stock at the purchase price, if any, originally paid upon termination of employment or service within specified periods, (3) employee or nonemployee director representations that the employee or nonemployee director intends to acquire such stock for investment and not for resale and (4) other restrictions, conditions and terms as the 2007 Plan Committee deems appropriate.

Performance Awards. Performance awards consist of Gray common stock or Class A common stock, stock units or cash-based units or a combination thereof, to be issued without payment therefor, if the performance goals established by the 2007 Plan Committee are achieved during the applicable performance period. The goals established by the 2007 Plan Committee may be based upon Company-wide performance or upon operating unit performance or a combination thereof and may include return on average total capital employed, earnings per share, return on shareholders’ equity, market share, growth in Broadcast Cash Flow, growth in Broadcast Cash Flow Less Cash Corporate Expenses, growth in EBITDA, growth in total revenue and/or specified components of total revenue, reduction in or the limitation in the growth of specified operating expenses, attainment of and/or maintenance of specified operating margins, attainment of and/or maintenance of specified weighted average costs of debt, attainment of and/or maintenance of specified weighted costs of capital, operating income (loss), income (loss) from continuing operations, pretax income from continuing operations and, for a performance award that the 2007 Plan Committee determines shall not be designed to comply with the performance-based exception under Section 162(m) of the Code, such other goals as may be established by the 2007 Plan Committee. Actual payment of the performance award earned shall be in a single sum and in cash or in Gray common stock or Class A common stock or in a combination of both, as determined by the 2007 Plan Committee in its sole discretion. If Gray common stock or Class A common stock is used, the participant will not have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon until the goals are achieved and the actual shares are issued. If the performance award is paid in cash instead of Gray common stock or Class A common stock, the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2007 Incentive Plan and the number of shares which may be granted in the form of performance awards will be reduced as if shares had been issued. The 2007 Plan Committee will certify in writing that any performance goals and any other material terms of a performance award have been achieved prior to the actual payment of the performance award. All performance awards will be paid in full no later than the fifteenth day of the third month following the end of the first calendar year in which the applicable performance period ends or such awards are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

Adjustments, Amendments and Termination of the 2007 Incentive Plan. In the event of any change in corporate capitalization, certain corporate transactions, other distribution of stock or property, or any reorganization or liquidation, such adjustment shall be made in the number and class of Gray common stock or Class A common stock which may be delivered, in the number and class of and/or price of shares subject to outstanding awards granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan, and in the award limits as may be determined to be appropriate and equitable by the 2007 Plan Committee, in its sole discretion, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights, provided, however, that the number of shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock subject to any award must always be a whole number. The 2007 Plan Committee may not make any adjustments that would cause an award (1) that is exempt from Section 409A of the Code to become subject to Section 409A of the Code or (2) that is subject to Section 409A of the Code to fail to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. The awards are intended to comply with the exemptions or deferred compensation requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

The board of directors has the right to amend or terminate the 2007 Incentive Plan at any time; provided, however, that except as specifically provided in the adjustment and change in control provisions of the 2007 Incentive Plan or otherwise required by law, no amendment or termination shall reduce the amount of any existing award or change the terms and conditions of an existing award without the participant’s consent. In addition, with the exception of the adjustments described above, no amendment or other similar actions shall: (1) increase the total number of shares that may be issued under the 2007 Incentive Plan or increase the amount or type of awards that may be granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan; (2) change the minimum purchase price (if any) of shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock which may be made subject to awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan; or (3) modify the eligibility requirements, unless first duly approved by the shareholders of Gray.

Furthermore, except in connection with a corporate transaction or event described in the adjustment provision of the 2007 Incentive Plan, shareholder approval is required to amend the terms of outstanding awards to reduce the base price, or cancel outstanding options or SARs in exchange for cash, other awards or options or SARs with a base price that is less than the base price of the original options or SARs as applicable.

Change in Control. The 2007 Incentive Plan provides that in the event of a change of control of Gray, the 2007 Plan Committee may make such adjustments with respect to awards and take such other action as it deems advisable such as the substitution of new awards, the adjustment, termination or removal of restrictions on outstanding awards, the acceleration of awards, or the termination of outstanding awards in exchange for the cash value determined in good faith by the 2007 Plan Committee of the vested and/or unvested portion of the award. Any adjustment may provide, in the 2007 Plan Committee’s discretion, for the elimination, without payment, of any fractional shares that might otherwise become subject to an award, but may not otherwise diminish the then value of the award. The adjustment and manner of application of the foregoing will be determined by the 2007 Plan Committee in its sole discretion and to the extent permitted under Section 409A of the Code.

A “change in control” is deemed to have occurred if (1) any person (other than Gray or a permitted holder) is or becomes the beneficial owner of 45% percent or more of the combined voting power of Gray’s then outstanding securities; (2) during any period of two consecutive years individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the board cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, unless the election or nomination of such new directors is approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then still in office who were directors at the beginning of the period but excluding any individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of either an actual or threatened election contest or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a person other than the board of directors; (3) there is consummated any consolidation or merger of Gray in which Gray is not the continuing or surviving corporation or pursuant to which shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock are converted into cash, securities or other property, other than a merger of Gray in which holders of Gray’s common stock or Class A common stock immediately prior to the merger have the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger; (4) there is consummated any consolidation or merger of Gray in which Gray is the continuing or surviving corporation in which the holders of Gray’s common stock or Class A common stock immediately prior to the merger do not own 51% percent or more of the combined voting power of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger; (5) there is consummated any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all, or substantially all of Gray’s assets; or (6) the shareholders of Gray approve any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of Gray.

Non-Transferability of Awards. No award may be transferred by the recipient, except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution and each award shall be exercisable, during the participant’s lifetime, only by the participant.

Withholding.Gray has the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a participant to remit to Gray, an amount sufficient to satisfy Federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of the 2007 Incentive Plan. With respect to withholding required upon the exercise of options or SARs, upon the lapse of restrictions on restricted stock, or upon any other taxable event arising as a result of awards granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan, participants may make an irrevocable election, subject to the approval of the 2007 Plan Committee, to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having Gray withhold shares having a fair market value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to the minimum statutory total tax which could be imposed on the transaction.

Award Grant Period. No award shall be granted more than 10 years after May 2, 2007.

Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences. The following discussion is designed to provide a summary of the material Federal income tax consequences with respect to awards granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan as of the date of this proxy statement. Any entitlement to a tax deduction on the part of Gray is subject to the applicable Federal tax rules, including, those relating to the $1 million limitation on deductible compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and possible excise taxes on executives or loss of Gray’s deductions under Section 280G of the Code if the vesting of awards is accelerated on or in connection with a change in control of Gray.

•

Incentive Stock Options. Certain options granted or that may be granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan will be incentive stock options as defined in the Code, provided that such options satisfy the requirements under the Code applicable to incentive stock options. In general, neither the grant nor the exercise of any incentive stock option will result in taxable income to the optionee or a deduction to Gray. The sale of Gray common stock received upon the exercise of an option which satisfies all the requirements of an incentive stock option, as well as the holding period requirement described below, will result in a long term capital gain or loss to the optionee equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and the option price and will not result in a tax deduction to Gray. The exercise of an incentive stock option may have implications in the computation of the optionee’s alternative minimum tax. To receive capital gain or loss treatment upon the disposition of Gray common stock acquired through exercise of an incentive stock option, the optionee must not dispose of the Gray common stock purchased pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option within two years after the option is granted and must hold such Gray common stock for at least one year after the transfer of such Gray common stock to the optionee.

If all requirements for incentive stock option treatment other than the holding period rules are satisfied, the recognition of income by the optionee is deferred until disposition of the Gray common stock, but, in general, any gain in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the fair market value of the Gray common stock on the date of exercise minus the option price or (2) the amount realized on the disposition minus the option price is treated as ordinary income. Any remaining gain is treated as long-term or short-term capital gain depending on the optionee’s holding period for the stock that has been sold. Gray will generally be entitled to a deduction at that time equal to the amount of ordinary income realized by the optionee.

•

Nonqualified Stock Option. An optionee generally will realize no taxable income upon the grant of a nonqualified stock option and Gray will not receive a deduction at the time of such grant. Upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option, the optionee generally will realize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the Gray common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price. Upon a subsequent sale of the Gray common stock by the optionee, the optionee will recognize short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending upon his or her holding period for the Gray common stock. Gray will generally be allowed a deduction equal to the amount recognized by the optionee as ordinary income.

•

SARs. Generally, no Federal income tax consequences are incurred by Gray or the holder at the time a SAR is granted pursuant to the 2007 Incentive Plan. However, upon the exercise of a SAR, the holder will generally realize ordinary income for Federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of cash or the value of property received by him or her. Gray generally will be entitled at such time to a deduction for Federal income tax purposes in the same amount realized as ordinary income. If a holder of a SAR receives Gray common stock upon

the exercise of such right and subsequently disposes of such Gray common stock, any gain or loss realized upon the sale will be either long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on the holder’s holding period for the Gray common stock that has been sold.

•

Restricted Stock Awards. The Federal income tax consequences of a restricted stock award granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan will depend, in large measure, on the restriction placed on the stock. In general, if the stock is “not transferable” and subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture,” then, unless the recipient makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code within 30 days of the grant, he or she will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the stock in the year the stock is either transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture over the price, if any, paid for the stock. If the recipient makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code, he or she will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the stock at the time of the award over the price, if any, paid for the stock.

Any gain or loss on a subsequent sale of the stock will be his or her long-term or short-term capital gain or loss depending on the recipient’s holding period for the stock. Gray will generally be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the recipient.

•
Performance Awards. A participant who is granted a performance award will recognize no income upon grant of the performance award. At the time the cash and/or stock is received as payment in respect of a performance award, the participant will realize compensation income equal to the sum of the cash and the fair market value of the shares received. Gray will generally be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the recipient.
Additional Information Regarding Plan Benefits
Reference is made to the sections captioned “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Decisions Made in 2011—Long-Term Incentive Grants,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2011” and “Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2011” for detailed information on stock incentive awards and exercises of such awards by certain executive officers under the 2007 Incentive Plan. Our named executive officers, other than Mr. Beizer, have received options to purchase common stock under the 2007 Incentive Plan as follows: Mr. Howell (173,062 shares), Mr. Prather (584,822 shares) and Mr. Ryan (132,398 shares). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Beizer did not receive any options to purchase common stock under the 2007 Incentive Plan. All current executive officers as a group have been granted options under the 2007 Incentive Plan to purchase 954,568 shares of common stock. In addition, options to purchase an aggregate of 793,200 shares have been granted to all employees of the Company as a group, excluding current executive officers, under the 2007 Incentive Plan.
Market Price of the Common Stock
As of April 2, 2012 the closing price of the Gray Class A common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange was $1.65 per share, and the closing price of the Gray common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange was $1.99 per share.
17
Plan Benefits
No grants have been made under the 2007 Incentive Plan that are subject to shareholder approval at the 2012 Annual Meeting. The Management Personnel Committee, which has functioned as the 2007 Plan Committee, currently expects that, if Amendment No. 1 is approved by Gray’s shareholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting, it will make grants of shares of restricted stock to each of Gray’s nonemployee directors, or director nominees, valued at $40,000. The following table shows the restricted stock that Gray expects will be granted to its current nonemployee directors, and director nominee, at the 2012 Annual Meeting. Other than these expected grants, it is not possible to determine specific amounts and types of awards that may be awarded in the future under the 2007 Incentive Plan because the grant and actual pay-out of awards under such plan is discretionary.
Nonemployee Director or
Director Nominee
   Dollar
Value
($)    Number of
Shares of
Restricted Stock (1)
(#)
William E. Mayher, III
   40,000       20,101
Richard L. Boger
   40,000       20,101
Ray M. Deaver
   40,000       20,101
T. L. Elder
   40,000       20,101
Robin R. Howell
   40,000       20,101
Howell W. Newton
   40,000       20,101
Hugh E. Norton
   40,000       20,101
Harriett J. Robinson
   40,000       20,101
J. Mack Robinson
   40,000       20,101
(1) Based on the closing price of $1.99 per share of Gray’s common stock on April 2, 2012, the most recent practicable date. The actual number of shares granted to each individual will be determined by reference to the closing price of Gray’s common stock on the grant date.
18
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table gives information about the common stock and Class A common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2011.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan Category
   Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(in thousands)
(#) Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options
warrants and rights    Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in 1st column)
(in thousands)
(#)
Common Stock:

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
   1,002 (1) $ 7.50       7,383 (1)(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
   —      $ —         —




Total
   1,002       7,383




Class A Common Stock:

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
   —   (1) $ —         1,000 (1)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
   —      $ —         —




Total
   —         1,000




(1) Under our 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, we are authorized to issue new awards of options to acquire up to 4,997,250 shares of either our common stock or our Class A common stock; however, of this amount, we cannot grant options to acquire in excess of 1,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock. For purposes of this disclosure, we have assumed the issuance of new awards of options to acquire 3,997,250 shares of our common stock and 1,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock, the maximum number of shares of Class A common stock issuable under the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan. We may, from time to time in the future, issue awards exercisable for more shares of common stock and fewer shares of Class A common stock.
(2) Includes 1,615,281 shares of our common stock that are issuable under our Capital Accumulation Plan, which is intended to meet the requirements of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, and 770,000 shares of our common stock that are issuable under our Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the amendments to the Gray Television, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan.
19
PROPOSAL 3
RATIFICATION OF COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2012
Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm is appointed annually by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee examines a number of factors when selecting a firm, including the qualifications, staffing considerations, and the independence and quality controls of the firms considered. The Audit Committee has appointed McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2012. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP has served as Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2006 and is considered by management to be well-qualified.
Shareholder ratification of the selection of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required but is being presented to our shareholders as a matter of good corporate practice. Notwithstanding shareholder ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a new independent registered public accounting firm if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Should the shareholders not ratify the selection of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2012 under this proposal, it is contemplated that the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP for the 2012 fiscal year will nevertheless be permitted to stand unless the Audit Committee, on reconsideration, finds other compelling reasons for making a change.
Representatives of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP are expected to be present at the 2012 Annual Meeting and, if present, will be given the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire, and to respond to appropriate questions.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2012.
20

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We are in compliance with the NYSE corporate governance ~~rules, which were adopted in connection with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~rules. We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our directors, executive officers and employees. If any waiver of this Code of Ethics is granted, the waiver will be disclosed in ~~a Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)~~an SEC filing on Form 8-K. Our Code of Ethics and the written charters of our Audit Committee and our Management Personnel Committee, which acts as our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee under separate charters, as well as our Corporate Governance Principles, are available under the heading ~~“Governance Documents”~~Governance Documents in the ~~“Corporate Governance”~~Corporate Governance section of our website atwww.gray.tv. All such information is also available in print to any shareholder upon request by telephone at (404) 266-8333.

After considering all applicable regulatory requirements and assessing the materiality of each director’s relationship with us, our Board ~~of Directors~~ has affirmatively determined that all of our directors are independent in accordance with Sections 303A.02(a) and (b) of the NYSE listing standards and the standards set forth in the ~~Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”)~~IRC and the ~~Securities~~ Exchange Act, ~~of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”),~~ except for: (1) Mr. Robinson, due to his family relationship with Mrs. Robinson and Mr. Howell; (2) Mr. Prather, due to his status as an executive officer; (3) Mr. Howell, due to his status as an executive officer; and (4) Mrs. Robinson, due to her family relationships with Mr. Robinson and Mr. Howell. In addition, the Board has determined that Mrs. Howell is not independent due to her family relationship with Mrs. Robinson and Mr. Howell. Consequently, our Board ~~of Directors~~ has determined that ~~seven~~six of our ~~eleven~~ten current directors, and six of our ten director nominees, are independent in accordance with the listing standards of the NYSE and the standards set forth in the IRC and the Exchange Act.

In addition, the Board had previously determined that, prior to his retirement from the Board, Senator Miller was independent.

Gray encourages interested ~~party communication~~parties to communicate with its ~~Board of Directors.~~Board. Any interested party who wishes to communicate with the Board ~~of Directors~~ or with any particular director, including any independent director, may send a letter to our ~~Secretary, Robert A. Beizer, 1750 K Street, NW, Suite 1200, Washington, D.C.~~Vice President Law and Development, Gray Television, Inc., ~~20006,~~4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319, which communications will be forwarded to the Board ~~of Directors~~ by the ~~Secretary.~~Vice President Law and Development. Any communication should indicate that you are an interested party and clearly specify that such communication is intended to be made to the entire Board ~~of Directors~~ or to one or more particular directors.

The Board ~~of Directors~~ has adopted a policy that all directors on the Board ~~of Directors~~ are expected to attend annual meetings of the shareholders. All ~~the~~then-current members of our Board ~~of Directors~~ attended the ~~2009~~2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in ~~person except Zell B. Miller who attended via telephone.~~

The Board of Directors held six meetings during 2009. During 2009, each of the directors attended all of the meetings of the Board of Directors and meetings of all committees of the Board of Directors on which such directors served.

person.

In accordance with Section 303A.03 of the NYSE listing standards, the independent non-management directors met in executive session four times during ~~2009.~~2011. Dr. Mayher, as the Chairman of the Board, presides over the executive sessions. Consistent with our belief that our leadership structure should reflect the best interests of the Company and our shareholders, we have not adopted a policy at this time stating whether or not the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board should be held by separate individuals. Rather, we believe that the Board ~~of Directors~~ should remain free to determine the leadership structure from time to time based upon the availability of qualified and competent candidates. ~~Prior to August 2008, Mr. Robinson ably served as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.~~ Currently, Mr. Howell serves in the role of Chief Executive Officer, while Dr. Mayher, who is ~~not~~ an ~~executive officer,~~independent director, serves as Chairman of the Board. We believe the resulting structure is appropriate for Gray at this time because it allows us to ~~fully exploit~~make the best use of the capabilities of these individuals in their respective roles while indicating to our shareholders that we also value the perspective of independent leadership on our ~~Board of Directors.~~Board. With respect to potential transactions with related parties required to be disclosed pursuant to Item ~~404 (a)~~404(a) of Regulation S-K, of the ~~SEC,~~Audit Committee charter provides that the Audit Committee must review and approve such transactions in advance after full disclosure of the nature

and extent of the related party’s interest in any such transaction. ~~See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” for a description~~The Company did not engage in any such related party transactions in 2011.

Management of the ~~business relationships Messrs. Norton~~Company is responsible for the Company’s day-to-day risk management, and ~~Robinson had with Gray~~the Board serves in ~~2009 that were approved by~~a risk management oversight role. The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling this oversight function. The Audit Committee and management of the Company periodically review various risks facing the Company and the internal controls and procedures in place to manage such risks. In addition, the Audit ~~Committee.~~

Committee and the Board consider risk-related matters on an on-going basis in connection with deliberations regarding specific transactions and issues.

BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEMBERSHIP

The Board held four meetings during 2011. During 2011, each of the directors attended all of the meetings of the Board and meetings of all committees of the Board on which such directors served.

Our Board ~~of Directors~~ has an Executive Committee. The Executive Committee is authorized between meetings of the Board, ~~of Directors,~~ to manage and direct our affairs, except as otherwise provided by law or as otherwise directed by the ~~Board of Directors.~~Board. All actions by the Executive Committee are subject to revision and alteration by the Board, ~~of Directors,~~ provided that no rights of third parties shall be affected by any such revision or alteration. The Executive Committee did not meet during ~~2009.~~2011. The members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Howell, Mayher (as Chairman) and Prather.

Our Board ~~of Directors~~ has an Audit Committee, the purpose of which is to review and evaluate the results and scope of the audit and other services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as our accounting policies and system of internal accounting controls, and to review and approve any transactions between us and ~~our directors, officers or significant shareholders.~~any related parties. The Audit Committee is governed by a written Audit Committee Charter, which was approved and adopted in its current form by the Board ~~of Directors~~ in June 2009 and can be found on our website atwww.gray.tv in the ~~“Corporate Governance”~~Corporate Governance section under the heading ~~“Governance Documents.”~~Governance Documents. The Audit Committee held ~~four~~five meetings during ~~2009.~~2011. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Boger, Elder, Mayher and Newton (as Chairman). The Board ~~of Directors~~ has affirmatively determined that T.L. (Gene) Elder is an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined under applicable SEC rules. Our identification of Mr. Elder as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on him any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liabilities imposed on the other members of the Audit Committee. The Board ~~of Directors~~ has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are independent in accordance with NYSE and ~~the~~ SEC rules governing audit committee member independence. The Audit Committee maintains a risk assessment process designed to identify risks facing

~~the Company~~ Gray that the ~~committee~~Audit Committee considers to be the most significant. In executing this ~~policy,~~process, the Audit Committee receives reports from management and other advisors and strives to generate serious and thoughtful strategies to mitigate those risks. Management periodically meets with the Audit Committee and reviews such risks and the relevant strategies. The report of the Audit Committee is set forth in this ~~Proxy Statement~~proxy statement under the heading ~~“Report~~Report of Audit ~~Committee.”~~

Committee.

Our Board ~~of Directors~~ has a Management Personnel Committee that functions as both the Compensation Committee and the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee. The Management Personnel Committee has adopted separate written charters to govern its activities as the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, respectively, current copies of which are available on our website atwww.gray.tv in the ~~“Corporate Governance”~~Corporate Governance section under the heading ~~“Governance Documents.” As~~Governance Documents. In its capacity as the Compensation Committee, the Management Personnel Committee makes recommendations with respect to executive salaries, bonuses and long-term compensation. The Management Personnel Committee held four meetings in ~~2009,~~2011, during which

meetings it performed the functions of both the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Its current members are Messrs. Deaver (as Chairman), Mayher, ~~Miller~~ and Norton. Mr. Miller also served on the committee until his retirement in December 2011. The Board ~~of Directors~~ has affirmatively determined that all current members of the Management Personnel Committee are independent, and Senator Miller was independent, in accordance with NYSE, SEC and IRC rules governing independence. ~~In July 2009, the Management Personnel Committee retained Grant Thornton LLP to advise it on current trends and best practices in compensation.~~ The report of the Management Personnel Committee is set forth in this ~~Proxy Statement~~proxy statement under the heading ~~“Report~~Report of Management Personnel ~~Committee.”~~

Committee.

In addition to acting as our Compensation Committee, the Management Personnel Committee also acts as our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In this ~~function,~~capacity, the ~~committee~~Management Personnel Committee assists the Board ~~of Directors~~ in fulfilling its responsibilities to shareholders by identifying and screening individuals qualified to become our directors, recommending candidates to the Board ~~of Directors~~ for all directorships, evaluating the set of corporate governance principles and guidelines applicable to us that the Board ~~of Directors~~ has adopted, and overseeing the evaluation of the Board ~~of Directors~~ and management. In recommending candidates to the Board ~~of Directors~~ for nomination as directors, the Management Personnel Committee strives to identify individuals who bring a unique perspective to Gray’s leadership and contribute to the overall diversity of our ~~Board of Directors.~~Board. Although the ~~committee~~Management Personnel Committee has not adopted a specific written diversity policy for nominations, we believe that a diversity of experience, gender, race, ethnicity and age contributes to effective governance for the benefit of our shareholders. In practice, the Management Personnel Committee considers such characteristics together with the other qualities displayed by our candidates, such as judgment, skill, integrity and experience. The ~~committee~~Management Personnel Committee does not assign a particular weight to these individual factors. Rather, the ~~committee~~Management Personnel Committee looks for a mix of factors that, when considered along with the experience and credentials of the other candidates and existing directors, will provide shareholders with a diverse and experienced ~~Board of Directors.~~Board. Historically, we have not used a recruiting firm to assist with this process.

The Management Personnel Committee will consider recommendations for director nominees submitted by shareholders. The Management Personnel Committee’s evaluation of candidates recommended by our shareholders does not differ materially from its evaluation of candidates recommended from other sources. Shareholders wishing to recommend director candidates for consideration by the Management Personnel Committee may do so by writing to our ~~Secretary,~~Vice President Law and Development, giving the candidate’s name, biographical data, qualifications and all other information that is required to be disclosed under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The foregoing information should be forwarded to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o ~~Robert A. Beizer, 1750 K Street, NW, Suite 1200, Washington, D.C.~~Vice President Law and Development, Gray Television, Inc., ~~20006.~~

4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319.

Our Board ~~of Directors~~ has a 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee, the purpose of which is to make recommendations concerning grants of ~~stock options,~~equity awards ~~and grants~~ under the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan and the ~~Gray Television, Inc.~~ Directors’ Restricted Stock ~~Plan (the “Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan”).~~Plan. The 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee did not hold any meetings in ~~2009,~~2011, and its members are Messrs. Deaver, Mayher, ~~Miller~~ and Norton (as Chairman), all of which are “non-employee directors” under applicable SEC rules.

Summary of Committee Memberships.


Audit Committee
~~Audit Committee~~	Management Personnel Committee

Howell W. Newton as Chairman		Ray M. Deaver as Chairman
Richard L. Boger		William E. Mayher, III
T. L. Elder	~~Zell B. Miller~~
~~William E. Mayher, III~~	Hugh E. Norton

William E. Mayher, III

2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee	~~Executive Committee~~
		Executive Committee

Hugh E. Norton as Chairman			William E. Mayher, III as Chairman
Ray M. Deaver			Hilton H. Howell, Jr.
William E. Mayher, III			Robert S. Prather, Jr.
~~Zell B. Miller~~

BENEFICIAL SHARE OWNERSHIP

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock and our common stock as of ~~April 16, 2010~~March 22, 2012 by (i) any person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our Class A common stock or our common stock, (ii) ~~all directors,~~each director and director nominee, (iii) ~~all~~each executive ~~officers~~officer named in the ~~“Summary Compensation Table” herein~~summary compensation table below and (iv) all directors and current executive officers as a group. For purposes of this table, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if he or she has or shares the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or the power to dispose or to direct the disposition of such security. Accordingly, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities that such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of within 60 days. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. The information as to beneficial ownership has been furnished by the respective persons listed in the following table. The percentages of each class are based on 5,753,020 shares of Class A common stock and ~~42,880,493~~51,405,846 shares of common stock outstanding as of ~~April 16, 2010.~~March 22, 2012. Shares underlying outstanding stock options exercisable within 60 days of such date are deemed to be outstanding for purposes of calculating the percentage owned by such holder.


Name	Class A Common Stock Beneficially Owned (GTN.A)					Common Stock Beneficially Owned (GTN)					Combined Voting Percent of Common and Class A Common Stock
Name	Shares		Percent			Shares		Percent			Combined Voting Percent of Common and Class A Common Stock
Robert A. Beizer		—		*			16,181		*			*
Richard L. Boger		36		*			9,071		*			*
Ray M. Deaver		—		*			327,696		*			*
T. L. Elder		2,000		*			19,000		*			*
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.(1)(3)		683,326		11.9	%		406,993		0.8	%		6.6	%
Robin R. Howell(2)		683,326		11.9	%		406,993		0.8	%		6.6	%
William E. Mayher, III		13,500		*			139,750		*			*
Howell W . Newton		2,625		*			25,225		*			*
Hugh E. Norton		13,500		*			39,750		*			*
Robert S. Prather, Jr.(4)		66,070		1.1	%		763,045		1.5	%		1.3	%
Harriett J. Robinson(3)(5)(6)		4,132,623		71.8	%		1,569,818		3.1	%		39.4	%
J. Mack Robinson(3)(6)(7)		4,132,623		71.8	%		1,569,818		3.1	%		39.4	%
James C. Ryan(8)		—		*			87,635		*			*
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(9)		—		*			3,164,217		6.2	%		2.9	%
FMR LLC(10)		—		*			7,427,397		14.4	%		6.8	%
BlackRock, Inc.(11)		—		*			2,987,866		5.8	%		2.7	%
Litespeed Management, L.L.C.(12)		—		*			3,598,568		7.0	%		3.3	%
All directors and executiveofficers as a group(13) (12 persons)		4,358,075		75.8	%		3,236,983		6.2	%		42.7	%

Combined
Voting
Class A Percent of
Common Stock Common Stock Common
Beneficially Owned Beneficially Owned and Class A
(GTN.A) (GTN) Common
Name Shares Percent Shares Percent Stock

Robert A. Beizer — * 16,181 * *
Richard L. Boger 3,736 * 44,941 * *
Ray M. Deaver — * 327,696 * *
T. L. Elder 2,000 * 21,000 * *
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.(1)(2) 681,550 11.8 % 481,283 1.1 % 7.3 %
William E. Mayher, III 13,500 * 139,750 * *
Zell B. Miller — * 20,500 * *
Howell W . Newton 2,625 * 25,225 * *
Hugh E. Norton 13,500 * 39,750 * *
Robert S. Prather, Jr.(3) 66,070 1.1 % 905,920 2.1 1.6 %
Harriett J. Robinson(2)(4)(5) 3,727,344 64.8 % 1,569,818 3.7 % 38.7 %
J. Mack Robinson(2)(5)(6) 3,727,344 64.8 % 1,569,818 3.7 % 38.7 %
James C. Ryan(7) — * 123,354 * *
Mario J. Gabelli(8) 238,275 4.1 % 2,536,675 5.9 % 4.9 %
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(9) — * 2,612,833 6.1 % 2.6 %
FMR LLC(10) — * 4,858,397 11.3 % 4.8 %
All directors and executive officers as a group(11) (13 persons) 3,954,720 68.7 % 3,441,548 7.9 % 42.4 %


*		Less than 1%.

(1)		Includes 59,075 shares of ~~the~~ Class A common stock owned by Mr. Howell’s wife directly and as trustee for her children, as to which shares he disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes options to purchase ~~122,870~~20,000 shares of common stock.

(2)

Includes: (a) an aggregate of 454,706 shares of Class A common stock and 341,993 shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mrs. Howell’s husband, (b) options to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock held Mrs. Howell’s husband and (c) 500 shares of Class A common stock owned by Mrs. Howell as trustee for her children. Mrs. Howell disclaims beneficial ownership of all such securities. Also includes an aggregate of 169,545 shares of Class A common stock and 45,000 shares of common stock owned by certain companies of which Mrs. Howell is an officer and director. In addition, excludes shares beneficially held by Mrs. Robinson as trustee for the benefit of Mrs. Howell.

(3)

Includes as to Messrs. Robinson and Howell and Mrs. Robinson, an aggregate of 555,605 shares of ~~the~~ Class A common stock and 151,000 shares of ~~the~~ common stock owned by certain companies of which Mr. Howell is an officer and a director, Mr. Robinson is an officer, director and a principal or sole shareholder and Mrs. Robinson is a director.


~~(3)~~	(4)	Includes options for Mr. Prather to purchase ~~642,875~~500,000 shares of ~~the~~ common stock. Mr. Prather has pledged 199,771 shares of common stock as security for a loan.


~~(4)~~	(5)	Includes: (a) an aggregate of 1,002,676 shares of ~~the~~ Class A common stock and 853,868 shares of ~~the~~ common stock owned by Mrs. Robinson’s husband and (b) 1,189,180 shares of ~~the~~ Class A common stock and 109,750 shares of the common stock owned by Mrs. Robinson, as trustee for her daughters. Mrs. Robinson disclaims beneficial ownership of all such securities.


~~(5)~~	(6)	Includes as to Mr. Robinson and Mrs. Robinson, an aggregate of ~~130,300~~490,298 shares of ~~the~~ Class A common stock and 100,000 shares of ~~the~~ common stock owned by Gulf Capital Services, Ltd., an entity controlled by Mr. Robinson.


~~(6)~~(7)		~~Includes: 2,038,763~~Includes 2,084,044 shares of ~~the~~ Class A common stock and 464,950 shares of ~~the~~ common stock owned by Mr. Robinson’s wife directly and as trustee for their daughters. Mr. Robinson disclaims beneficial ownership of all such securities.


~~(7)~~	(8)	Includes options for Mr. Ryan to purchase ~~110,719~~75,000 shares of ~~the~~ common stock.


~~(8)~~		This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC by Gabelli Funds, LLC and also by Mario J. Gabelli and various entities which he directly or indirectly controls or for which he acts as chief investment officer. The address of Mr. Gabelli and Gabelli Funds, LLC is One Corporate Center, Rye, New York 10580.

(9)		This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2012 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. The address of Dimensional Fund Advisors L.P. is Palisades West, Building One, 6300 Bee ~~Cove~~Cave Road, Austin, Texas 78746.

(10)		This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2011 by FMR LLC and also by Edward C. Johnson 3d and various entities which he directly or indirectly controls. The address of FMR LLC is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

(11)	This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2012 by BlackRock, Inc. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 40 East 52^nd Street, New York, NY 10022.

(12)

This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2012 by Litespeed Management, LLC, Litespeed Master Fund, Ltd. and also by Jamie Zimmerman. The address of Litespeed Management, LLC is 237 Park Avenue, Suite 900, New York, New York 10017. The address of Litespeed Master Fund, Ltd is c/o Ogier Fiduciary Services (Cayman) Limited, 89 Nexus Way, Camana Bay, Grand Cayman KY 1-9007, Cayman Islands. The address of Jamie Zimmerman is 237 Park Avenue, Suite 900, New York, New York 10017.

(13)	The addresses for each of the directors and ~~named~~ executive officers of Gray Television, Inc. is 4370 Peachtree Road N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319. Amount does not include shares of common stock held by Mr. Beizer, who retired from the Company on February 29, 2012.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Management Personnel ~~Committee.~~Committee

The Management Personnel Committee of the Board ~~of Directors~~ serves as our Compensation Committee, ~~and~~ administers our executive compensation program and has the overall responsibility for approving and evaluating director and officer compensation plans, policies and programs. The Management Personnel Committee, in its capacity as the Compensation Committee, approves the compensation of each of our executive officers and all television station General Managers and establishes the compensation of our ~~Board of Directors.~~Board. The Management Personnel Committee consists of ~~four~~three members of our Board, ~~of Directors,~~ Messrs. Deaver, Mayher, ~~Miller~~ and Norton. The Board ~~of Directors~~ has affirmatively determined that all members of the Management Personnel Committee are independent in accordance with NYSE, SEC and IRC rules governing independence.

~~Compensation Philosophy and Policy.~~

Generally, we strive to establish compensation practices and provide compensation opportunities that attract, retain and reward our executives and strengthen the mutuality of interests between our executives and our shareholders in order to motivate them to maximize shareholder value. We believe that the most effective executive compensation program is one that is conservative, yet competitive, and which aligns long-term compensation to the creation of shareholder value.

The goals of our executive compensation program for 2009 were to retain, motivate and reward our executive officers. To achieve such goals, we relied primarily on salaries and other compensation for each of our executive officers.

The Management Personnel ~~Committee’s practice~~Committee engaged Grant Thornton LLP, an internationally recognized public accounting and consulting firm, to advise the committee, and at times management, with respect to Gray’s compensation programs for determining an executive’s salary, bonus and long-term incentive compensation was based on the position and responsibility of such executive, his impact on the operations and profitability of Gray and the knowledge and experience of such executive and comparisons to peer group companies.

2011.

Named Executive Officers

The ~~following~~ discussion of executive compensation includes information about our ~~named executive officers~~NEOs who are listed in the following table:

Executive
Officer
Name Since Age Position

Hilton H. Howell, Jr. 2000 48 Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Robert S. Prather, Jr. 1996 65 President and Chief Operating Officer
James C. Ryan 1998 49 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Robert A. Beizer 1996 70 Vice President for Law and Development and Secretary


Name	Executive Officer Since	Age	Position
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.	2000	50	Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Robert S. Prather, Jr.	1996	67	President and Chief Operating Officer
James C. Ryan	1998	51	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Robert A. Beizer	1996(1)	72	Vice President for Law and Development and Secretary

(1)	Effective February 29, 2012, Mr. Beizer retired from all positions with the Company.

~~Determining Competitive Practices~~

~~The goal~~Overview of ~~the Company~~Previous Year Performance and Compensation

In 2011, working with its independent compensation consultant, the Management Personnel Committee iscontinued to ~~structure a mix~~implement improvements to our executive compensation for alignment with current market best practices, including:

Ensuring an appropriate benchmarking of ~~compensation elements,~~executive roles to market data of the peer group, including ~~base salary, cash bonus~~both proxy data and ~~long-term~~published survey data, to determine the value of Gray’s executive positions;

Modifying the annual incentive ~~opportunities, which reward each executive officer for their~~program to reflect achievement of ~~personal as well as corporate-level~~quantifiable financial goals ~~while staying competitive within our peer group. We believe that~~established at the beginning of each fiscal year; and

Applying new methodology and market data in making incentive compensation ~~structure is similar to that~~decisions for 2011, which resulted in:

Base salary increases for two executives in 2011; and

Nonequity incentive compensation paid between target and maximum for 2011 performance based on achievement of ~~other comparable companies. For 2009,~~Management Personnel Committee-approved and pre-determined financial goals.

In fiscal year 2011, Gray had strong performance in an improving economic environment. In addition, compensation decisions regarding Gray’s ~~peer group~~NEOs for purposes of determining competitive compensation for our executive officers consists of Belo Corp., Emmis Communications, Lin TV Corp., Media General, Inc., Nexstar Broadcasting Group, and Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.

~~In 2009, the committee engaged Grant Thornton LLP to provide advice on the Company’s total compensation process and structure~~2011 and going forward in 2012 reflect the Management Personnel Committee’s consideration of the results of last year’s non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation.

For 2011 and 2010, ~~expects~~Gray paid cash compensation to ~~receive recommendations from Grant Thornton on~~its NEOs of $3,345,679 and $4,273,750, respectively. The decrease in cash compensation for each executive in 2011 relative to 2010 was primarily the ~~companies selected~~result of the 2010 payment of performance-based bonuses for Messrs. Howell, Prather and Ryan in specific recognition of their successful efforts in completing a series of refinancing transactions in that year, partially offset by increases in base salaries for Messrs. Howell and Ryan and, for certain of the NEOs, increases in nonequity incentive compensation in 2011. The following tables set forth the cash compensation paid to ~~represent the peer group, market comparisons between our executive’s compensation~~NEOs in 2011 and ~~the peer group’s compensation practices, and recommendations for~~ 2010, ~~competitive compensation levels and opportunities to be established for our executive officers.~~

respectively:


	2011
Name	Base Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Total Cash Compensation ($)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		500,000		—		413,181		913,181
Robert S. Prather, Jr.		950,000		—		457,942		1,407,942
James C. Ryan		375,000		—		154,943		529,943
Robert A. Beizer		350,000		—		144,613		494,613

		2,175,000		—		1,170,679		3,345,679


		2010
Name	Base Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Total Cash Compensation ($)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		400,000		350,000		360,000		1,110,000
Robert S. Prather, Jr.		950,000		350,000		498,750		1,798,750
James C. Ryan		350,000		350,000		157,500		857,500
Robert A. Beizer		350,000		—		157,500		507,500

		2,050,000		1,050,000		1,173,750		4,273,750

Elements of ~~the Company’s~~ Compensation Program

The compensation program for our executive officers is designed to provide the Management Personnel Committee with the flexibility to offer a combination of cash ~~(guaranteed~~(fixed and incentive-based) and equity-based compensation toopportunity, as appropriate, in order align the executive officers’ interests with those of our shareholders. ~~The~~Consistent with 2010, the executive compensation program for 2011 primarily ~~consists~~consisted of the following elements:

Base salary;

	•		~~Base salary;~~

	•		~~Annual cash bonuses; and~~

	•		~~Long-term incentive compensation, including equity-based awards~~

Annual incentive compensation opportunities; and

Long-term incentive compensation opportunities.

Each year, our executive officers are eligible for a base salary increase, an annual incentive award and a long-term incentive award based on the Management Personnel Committee’s evaluation of market data, Company and NEO performance, and achievement of goals.

The goals of our executive compensation program are to retain, motivate and reward our executive officers. We believe that the most effective executive compensation program is one that is conservative, yet competitive, and which aligns long-term compensation to the creation of shareholder value.

In 2011, the Management Personnel Committee ~~has not established~~based compensation decisions on a defined target market position of market median, or 50^th percentile, with opportunity for total compensation between the 50^th and 75^th percentiles as warranted based on Gray’s performance determined through achievement of approved performance goals.

Additionally, the Management Personnel Committee applied a formal policy approved in 2010 for ~~allocating between~~establishing compensation and incentive opportunity levels for each element of compensation, revising the ~~different forms~~annual, nonequity incentive structure to reflect achievement of ~~compensation. Instead,~~quantitative goals only. Individual performance goals were not established or used in determining cash bonuses or nonequity incentive plan compensation that might be awarded under the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan. The Management Personnel Committee strives to achieve an appropriate mix between the different forms of compensation in order to (1) motivate the ~~named~~ executive officers to deliver superior performance in the short-term by providing competitive base salaries, ~~and~~ annual incentive payments and cash bonuses for specific achievements, (2) align the interests of the ~~named~~ executive officers with the long-term interests of our shareholders through the grant of equity-based compensation and (3) provide an overall compensation package that promotes executive ~~retention.~~

retention and is aligned with the defined target market position.

Base salaries for our executives are established or adjusted based on the size/complexity of the Company, the scope of each individual executive’s role, the knowledge and experience of such executive, and the competitiveness of the executive’s total compensation as compared to peer group and other market data.

~~Process~~The process for ~~Establishing Executive Total Compensation~~

~~In establishing executive~~determining annual incentive compensation ~~levels for 2009,~~is based on how well, and to what extent, the Company performs against financial goals that are determined by the Management Personnel ~~Committee compared salaries~~Committee.

The decision to grant long-term incentives is generally discretionary in nature (as opposed to the formulaic approach to annual incentive compensation opportunities used by the Management Personnel Committee) and ~~bonuses~~is based each year on a retrospective qualitative evaluation of ~~our executive officers for~~ the ~~last five~~following factors, which are evaluated by the Management Personnel Committee:

The Company’s financial performance over a one- to three-year period, including the impact of political revenue in appropriate years ~~compared~~and achievements in reduction of debt;

The Company’s common stock and Class A common stock share price performance ~~compared~~over a one- to three-year period;

The Company’s overall performance and share price performance relative to its peer group; and

Competitiveness of current compensation levels.

Annual Incentive Performance Targets for 2011

The Management Personnel Committee established performance goals for 2011 based 100% on financial performance. Three financial performance measures comprise the financial performance measures historically used by Gray for purposes of valuing the Company’s ~~accomplishments~~business and approximating key financial performance covenants in ~~2009, compared~~certain financing agreements: (i) revenue (less agency commissions), (ii) broadcast cash flow, and (iii) net operating profit (“NOP”).

Gray’s NOP financial performance measure, by way of reference to Gray’s audited financial statements set forth in the Company’s Form 10-K, includes net income (loss), plus interest expense, plus income tax expense (benefit), plus loss on early extinguishment of debt, plus depreciation, plus amortization of intangible assets, less net gain on disposals of assets, and ~~operating profit margins~~less net miscellaneous income.

Gray’s “broadcast cash flow” financial performance measure is defined as NOP (discussed above) plus amortization of non-cash stock based compensation, plus amortization of program broadcast rights, plus common stock contributed to 401(k) plan, less network compensation revenue, plus network compensation per network affiliation agreements, less network expense per network affiliation agreements, less payments on program broadcast obligations, and ~~ultimately arrived at what it considers adequate~~plus corporate and ~~competitive compensation.~~

~~In determining whether to grant annual cash bonuses, equity-based awards or other awards,~~administrative expenses (excluding amortization of non-cash stock based compensation).

For each of the ~~Management Personnel Committee considers each executive officer’s~~financial performance ~~and contribution to our profits and~~measures, the following goals were established for 2011:


Financial Performance Measure	Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)
	(in thousands)
Revenue (less agency commissions)		282,950		297,842		327,626
NOP		85,347		89,839		98,823
Broadcast cash flow		95,902		100,949		111,044

The target performance goals were aligned with the Company’s internal business plan ~~objectives. When measuring an executive officer’s individual contribution~~ and performance, the Management Personnel Committee examines: (1) trends in our financial results, (2) satisfaction of personal goals, (3) relative market position and stock price, and (4) qualitative factors that necessarily involve judgmentannual budget as approved by the Management Personnel Committee. ~~In making such determinations,~~Threshold goals were established at 95% of target so that a level of performance near target was required to be achieved before any incentive payment was awarded, with a significant reduction to the incentive earned for results below target. Maximum awards were established at achievement of 110% of target, as the Management Personnel Committee ~~does not base its determination on any single performance factor nor does it assign relative weights~~believed this represented an appropriate amount of stretch in the goals. The Management Personnel Committee reviews the threshold, target and maximum criteria at the start of each fiscal year to ~~factors, but considers a mix~~ensure that an appropriate degree of ~~factors, including evaluations from superiors, and evaluates an individual’s performance against such mix in absolute terms in relation to~~difficulty is incorporated into the ~~other executive officers at Gray.~~

~~As reference, the “Summary Compensation Table” details the compensation set by~~goals.

In 2012, the Management Personnel Committee ~~in 2009~~expects to maintain the current structure for the determination of annual incentive awards such that 100% of the annual incentive award opportunity will be based on Gray’s financial performance, utilizing the same performance metrics of revenue (less agency commissions), NOP and broadcast cash flow.

Response to Say-On-Pay Vote

Although the advisory shareholder vote on executive compensation is non-binding, the Management Personnel Committee has considered, and will continue to consider, the outcome of this vote each year such a vote is taken when making compensation decisions for our ~~named~~CEO and other NEOs. At our annual meeting of shareholders held on June 1, 2011, over 98% of the shares present or represented by proxy at the meeting voted for the approval of the compensation of the CEO and other NEOs. The Compensation Committee believes that this shareholder vote strongly endorses the compensation philosophy of the Company. After considering the result of the 2011 advisory vote on our executive ~~officers.~~

compensation, the Management Personnel Committee did not believe it was necessary to undertake any material changes in the Company’s executive compensation programs. In addition, the shareholders approved a triennial frequency for submitting our executive compensation program to an advisory shareholder vote in the future.

Compensation Decisions Made in 2011

Base Salary

The base salary element of our executive compensation program provides each ~~executive officer~~NEO with a fixed amount of annual cash compensation. Salaries for the ~~executive officers~~NEOs are generally subject to annual review and adjustment by the Management Personnel Committee. ~~Adjustments are considered and made by taking into account recommendations made by~~

The Management Personnel Committee approved our ~~Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer and by weighing those recommendations against the executive officer’s~~NEOs’ base ~~salary history and the other factors noted above in “Process~~salaries for ~~Establishing Executive Total Compensation.”~~

~~Based significantly~~2011 on ~~the financial results of our operations and our expectations at the time for comparable performance in 2009, the committee~~March 17, 2011. The Management Personnel Committee determined to hold base salaries constant with the exception of Messrs. Howell and Ryan. Mr. ~~Howell. The~~Ryan’s base salary ~~for Mr. Howell includes a~~was increased to better align his pay with market ~~adjustment that is reflective of additional responsibilities and duties that he assumed in the role of Chief Executive Officer for Gray.~~data. Mr. Howell’s base salary was increased, to (i) better align his base pay with that of other executives with similar job descriptions and responsibilities as assessed through the compensation study, (ii) recognize his contributions and performance, and (iii) reflect the Management Personnel Committee’s awareness of an increase in the percentage of time Mr. Howell is ~~currently benchmarked against~~now devoting to the ~~market data~~role.

The base salaries paid to ~~reflect~~each of our NEOs were as follows for 2011 and 2010:


Name	2011 Salary Amount ($)		2010 Salary Amount ($)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		500,000		400,000
Robert S. Prather, Jr.		950,000		950,000
James C. Ryan		375,000		350,000
Robert A. Beizer		350,000		350,000

Mr. Howell’s 2010 and 2011 base salary took into consideration the fact that ~~in 2009~~ he worked less than full-time as our Chief Executive ~~Officer while transitioning into that role.~~Officer. The ~~committee plans~~Management Personnel Committee will continue to ~~increase~~monitor Mr. Howell’s base salary in the future, and make adjustments commensurate with his role as our Chief Executive Officer as he assumes greater responsibility in that ~~role.~~

role and as the amount of time spent in the role increases.

~~The following table sets forth the 2009 base salaries paid by us to each of our named executive officers:~~


	~~Salary Amount~~
~~Name~~	~~($)~~

~~Hilton H. Howell, Jr.~~		~~400,000~~
~~Robert S. Prather, Jr.~~		~~950,000~~
~~James C. Ryan~~		~~350,000~~
~~Robert A. Beizer~~		~~320,000~~

Mr. Prather’s base salary is reflective of (i) the critical role he plays in managing ~~the Company’s~~Gray’s performance, (ii) his assigned responsibilities beyond the typical role of a Chief Operating Officer and

(iii) the significant ~~Company~~institutional knowledge, history and relationships he maintains and ~~leverages.~~

~~Cash Bonus~~

~~Historically, we have followed a process of providing discretionary cash bonus awards to certain of our senior employees, including all~~leverages on behalf of the ~~named executive officers. The cash bonuses serve as an annual short-term incentive program designed to recognize~~Company and ~~reward employees who make significant contributions towards achieving the annual~~its business ~~plan.~~

In determining the amount of the bonuses, a number of factors are considered, including operating results, the achievement of certain financial performance objectives and the individual’s contribution to the Company or the business unit (which is a subjective analysis).

goals.

Annual Incentive Compensation

The Management Personnel Committee meets during the first quarter of each year, once adequate financial and other performance data from the prior fiscal year becomes available for review, and determines if any ~~bonuses~~annual incentive compensation will be awarded to the executive officers and the amount of ~~bonuses. Bonuses~~the incentive compensation.

The 2011 opportunity levels (expressed as a percentage of base salary) approved by the Management Personnel Committee for the NEOs in 2011 were ~~not awarded~~as follows:


Name	Annual Incentive Opportunity
Name	Threshold			Target			Maximum
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		30.0	%		60.0	%		90.0	%
Robert S. Prather, Jr.		17.5	%		35.0	%		52.5	%
James C. Ryan		15.0	%		30.0	%		45.0	%
Robert A. Beizer		15.0	%		30.0	%		45.0	%

The annual incentive opportunity levels were established to ~~our named executive officers for 2009 due~~provide each NEO with a market-competitive incentive opportunity linked to achievement of pre-determined financial goals. Actual performance levels between threshold and target, or between target and maximum, are used to determine incentive awards. Actual awards are determined formulaically by linear interpolation of those actual results as they relate to the ~~general economic downturn~~established financial performance goals and the percentage by which ~~resulted in lower than expected financial~~such goals were achieved or exceeded.

Nonequity annual incentive compensation payments for 2011 were calculated based on actual results ~~including revenue~~for 2011 and ~~profitability. Mr. Beizer was~~ paid ~~a bonus of $35,000 during 2009 as a result of his work on behalf~~subsequent to the end of the ~~Company in obtaining long-term signal carriage agreements with cable and satellite companies.~~

year. Annual incentive plan targets vs. Gray’s actual results for 2011 were as follows:
Financial Performance Measure
   Threshold
($)    Target
($)    Maximum
($)    Actual
($)
   (in thousands)
Revenue (less agency commissions)
   282,950       297,842       327,626       307,131
NOP
   85,347       89,839       98,823       98,762
Broadcast cash flow
   95,902       100,949       111,044       109,595
32
The following annual incentive compensation payments were made for 2011 performance:
Name
   Incentive Payment For Exceeding
   Revenue
(net of agency
commissions)
Goal
($)    NOP
Goal
($)    Broadcast
Cash Flow
Goal
($)    Total
Incentive
Payment
($)    Total Incentive
Payment as a
Percentage of
Base Salary
(%)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.
   86,696       112,249       214,236       413,181       82.6 %
Robert S. Prather, Jr.
   96,088       124,410       237,444       457,942       48.2 %
James C. Ryan
   32,511       42,093       80,339       154,943       41.3 %
Robert A. Beizer
   30,344       39,287       74,982       144,613       41.3 %









   245,639       318,039       607,001       1,170,679

Long-Term Incentive ~~Compensation~~

Grants

In order to align the interests of our executive officers and other key management personnel responsible for our growth with the interests of our shareholders, we ~~have~~ established the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, which provides for equity-based awards. ItIf stock options are awarded, it is our practice to grant options with an exercise price equal to the closing price of our Class A common stock and/or our common stock on the date of grant. ~~The decision to issue options and other awards begins with our Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer suggesting that an award is appropriate, and~~

Long-term incentive grant guidelines are used by the Management Personnel Committee ~~then considers~~to determine and understand market competitive parameters for making long term incentive award decisions. Unlike the ~~suggestion. In deciding~~formulaic annual incentive award opportunities, which are tied to the Company’s actual performance compared to goals, the decision to grant long-term incentive awards generally remains within the discretion of the Management Personnel Committee.

The long-term incentive grant guidelines (expressed as a percentage of base salary) considered by the Management Personnel Committee for the purpose of consideration of long-term incentive awards in 2011 remained unchanged from those approved by the Management Personnel Committee in 2010, and were as follows:


Name	Long-term Incentive Opportunity Guidelines
Name	Threshold			Target			Maximum
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		30.0	%		60.0	%		90.0	%
Robert S. Prather, Jr.		17.5	%		35.0	%		52.5	%
James C. Ryan		15.0	%		30.0	%		45.0	%
Robert A. Beizer		15.0	%		30.0	%		45.0	%

The decision of whether or not to ~~grant equity-based rewards~~make long-term incentive grants in any year is based on a retrospective and qualitative assessment of factors, as discussed above under the headingElements of Compensation Program. The Management Personnel Committee did not award any long-term incentive grants to ~~an individual and~~the NEOs in ~~determining the size of the award,~~2011. Based upon 2011 performance, in 2012, the Management Personnel Committee ~~takes into account subjective considerations, including the level~~approved grants of ~~such executive’s position and the individual’s contribution~~long-term incentive awards to ~~our objectives. Type, vesting and other characteristics of awards within~~certain NEOs effective April 2, 2012. Important to the Management Personnel Committee’s ~~discretion are~~decision to award these long-term incentive grants,

were the Company’s and the individual’s performance in 2011, the fact that long-term incentive equity grants had not been made in recent years, total shareholder return as compared to the Company’s peer group, and competitiveness of each NEO’s total compensation. The Management Personnel Committee approved awards equal to the 2011 “target” opportunity guidelines for Messrs. Howell and Ryan, and equal to the “threshold” opportunity guideline for Mr. Prather, given the competitiveness of Mr. Prather’s current total compensation. No award was considered for Mr. Beizer due to his retirement.

This resulted in the following value-based awards being granted by the Management Personnel Committee:

Mr. Howell: $300,000 award, 60% of his 2011 base salary ;

Mr. Prather: $166,250 award, 17.5% of his 2011 base salary; and

Mr. Ryan: $112,500 award, 30% of his 2011 base salary.

After considering the mix of awards provided by peer group companies to similarly situated executives, and the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, the Management Personnel Committee approved an award mix intended to provide a balance between retention and performance improvement, with 50% of the value to be delivered through restricted stock grants with three-year ratable vesting, and 50% of the value to be delivered through stock option grants with four-year ratable vesting and a ten-year contractual term. The number of restricted shares granted was determined ~~on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration~~by dividing one-half of the ~~recommendations~~grant value by the fair market value of our ~~Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer as well as~~common stock on the ~~criteria discussed above.~~

~~Equity-based awards have typically been granted to executive officers to reward strong Company performance. In 2009, we did not issue equity-based awards~~grant date of the award, rounded up to the ~~executive officers under the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan because~~nearest whole number of shares. The number of options granted was determined by dividing one-half of the ~~effect~~grant value by the fair value of a stock option as determined using the ~~economic downturn on our financial results.~~

Black-Scholes Merton valuation method, rounded up to the nearest whole number of options.

Qualified Benefit Plans

The executive officers participate in the following qualified benefit plans in which all employees are eligible to participate: the Gray Television, Inc. Capital Accumulation (401(k)) Plan (“Capital Accumulation Plan”)~~; Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), which was discontinued effective June 30, 2009;~~ and the Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan (“Pension Plan”). Mr. Ryan also participates in the Busse Pension Plan (the “Busse Pension Plan”). The ~~“Pension~~Company acquired Busse Broadcasting Corporation (“Busse”) in July 1998 and the Busse Pension Plan was assumed in that transaction. Mr. Ryan is a former employee of Busse. The table in the section entitledPension Benefits ~~in 2009” table~~ herein lists the years of credited service and the present value of each ~~named executive officer’s~~NEO’s accumulated pension benefit, assuming payment begins at age 65, under the ~~Pension Plan.~~

pension plans.

Capital Accumulation ~~(401(k))~~ Plan

We currently sponsor the Gray Television, Inc. Capital Accumulation Plan to encourage eligible employees to defer a part of their current income to provide for their retirement, death or disability under the provisions of Section 401(k) of the IRC. The plan covers all of our employees. Under the Capital Accumulation Plan, participants may elect to make pre-tax savings deferrals from their compensation each year, subject to annual limits on such deferrals imposed by the IRC. We may also, at our discretion, on an annual basis, make a matching contribution with respect to a participant’s elective deferrals and/or may make additional voluntary contributions. For the year ended December 31, ~~2009,~~2011, we did not match employee contributions except for employees at one orof our stations, in accordance with the terms of their union ~~contracts.~~contract. Participants are immediately vested in their voluntary contributions plus the actual earnings thereon. Employer contributions and earnings thereon become 100% vested after the participant completes three years of service. The only form of benefit payment under the Capital Accumulation Plan is a single lump-sum payment equal to the vested balance in the participant’s account. The vested portion of a participant’s accrued benefit is payable upon such employee’s termination of employment, attainment

of age 59 1/2, retirement, total and permanent disability, or death. Participants may also make in-service withdrawals from their pre-tax contributions under the plan for certain specified instances of hardship.

~~Employee Stock Purchase~~

Pension Plan

We offered an ESPP to eligible employees (including the named executive officers) to provide eligible employees (including the named executive officers) with an opportunity to purchase our common stock through payroll deductions as a means of purchasing our common stock as a long-term investment. Effective June 30, 2009, we discontinued our ESPP due to the considerable costs associated with maintaining the plan. Messrs. Howell and Prather participated in the ESPP in 2009, 2008 and 2007. See footnote (2) in the “All Other Compensation Table” for a discussion of the specific benefits amounts each executive received in 2009 under the ESPP.

~~Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan~~

For each of the named executive officers, the “Pension Benefits in 2009” table lists the years of credited service and the present value of each executive officer’s accumulated pension benefit, assuming payment begins at age 65, under, the Pension Plan.

Under the terms of the Pension Plan, in the event of the death of an executive officer before retirement, 50% of the accrued benefit will become payable to the surviving spouse at the time the deceased participant would have reached age 65. If the deceased participant had completed ten or more years of service, the survivor benefit may commence as early as the time the deceased participant would have reached age 55. If the deceased participant would have been

eligible for early retirement at the time of death, survivor benefits may commence as soon as practicable. Any benefits that commence before the deceased participant would have reached age 65 will be reduced the same as early retirement benefits would have been reduced. In the event a disability occurs before retirement, the accrued benefit will become payable at age 65. No break in service will occur and benefits will continue to accrue during disability. In the event of voluntary termination, the vested accrued benefit will become payable at age 65. If the participant had completed ten or more years of service, the benefit may commence as early as age 55. If the participant had completed less than five years of credited service, the accrued benefit is not vested, and no future benefits would be payable from the Pension Plan.

Compensation Framework: Policies, Process and Risk ~~Mitigation~~Considerations.

Determining Competitive Practices

In 2010, Gray established a compensation peer group for purposes of determining competitive compensation for our executive officers. The Management Personnel Committee spent considerable time reviewing the peer group initially proposed by Grant Thornton LLP, and closely examined the included companies before finalizing the peer group. The peer group selection criteria included broadcasting companies (television, radio, and companies with a combination of television and radio operations). As a general guideline, companies were included with revenues of one-half of Gray’s revenue and up to two times Gray’s revenue, with median revenue of the peer group closely aligned with Gray’s revenue.

The compensation peer group originally consisted of seventeen (17) companies, including Belo Corp, Crown Media Holdings, Inc., Cox Radio Inc., Cumulus Media, Inc., Emmis Communications, Entercom Communications Corp, Entravision Communications, Fisher Communications, Inc., Lin TV Corp., Media General, Hearst-Argyle Television, Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Radio One Inc., Salem Communications Corp., Sinclair Broadcast GP, Spanish Broadcasting Sys Inc, and Westwood One Inc. The peer group has a median revenue closely aligned with Gray and better protects against potential volatility in data that may result from changes in peer group company status. Two of the companies, Cox Radio Inc., and Hearst-Argyle Television, are no longer public and were not included in the 2011 peer group benchmarking analysis.

The Management Personnel Committee uses the peer group for executive compensation comparisons, and ensured an appropriate benchmarking of executive roles to market data, including both proxy data (weighted at 75%) and published survey data (weighted at 25%) to determine the market value of Gray’s executive positions.

Process for Establishing Executive Total Compensation

In reviewing NEO compensation levels for 2011, the Management Personnel Committee reviewed a competitive market study prepared by Grant Thornton LLP. The study compared Gray’s practices regarding base salary, bonus, equity, cash incentives, perquisites and other compensation of its NEOs with market practices as reported in published survey data and for the approved peer group.

Risk Considerations

Companies are expected to review their compensation policies and practices and incentive plans and programs to evaluate if such compensation policies and practices and incentive plans and programs are appropriately structured for the company and its business objectives and discourage executives from taking excessive risk. In designing the components of ~~our executive~~Gray’s compensation ~~program,~~policies and practices and incentive plans and programs, we have attempted to mitigate the possibility that excessive short-term risks are being taken ~~by our executive officers~~ at the expense of long-term value. These mitigation strategies include: (1) the annual review and approval of the financial performance considerations by the Management Personnel Committee; (2) the use of multiple performance objectives, thus mitigating too heavy a focus on any one in particular; and (3) vesting of stock awards over time to motivate ~~executives~~NEOs to focus on providing consistent results over the longer term.

~~Role of Management in Setting Compensation~~

For 2009, our Chief Executive Officer, with input from our President and Chief Operating Officer, recommended the annual compensation levels, including bonuses, for all executive officers (including himself) of Gray and its subsidiaries to the Management Personnel Committee for its review and approval. The Management Personnel Committee ~~in setting the annual~~has reviewed Gray’s compensation ~~levels for our executive officers, then reviews these recommendations against prior years’ compensation amounts, the current year’s financial~~policies and ~~market results,~~practices and ~~available compensation data from our peer group. After the committee has made adjustments~~incentive plans and programs, including all of its business units, to ~~the recommended compensation it deems appropriate~~determine if they encourage individuals to take unreasonable risks; and has ~~approved~~determined that any risks arising from these compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the ~~annual compensation levels for our executive officers, it reports to the Board of Directors with its final determination.~~

Company.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

In ~~2009,~~2011, the Management Personnel Committee engaged Grant Thornton LLP, an internationally recognized public accounting and consulting firm, to advise the ~~committee, and at times management,~~Management Personnel Committee with respect to ~~the Company’s~~Gray’s compensation programs for ~~2010.~~2011. A Grant Thornton LLP representative reports directly to the ~~committee~~Management Personnel Committee as its compensation advisor. The Management Personnel Committee annually reviews the role of its compensation advisor and believes that the advisor is fully independent for purposes of providing executive compensation recommendations. To ensure independence, the ~~committee~~Management Personnel Committee directly hires and has the sole authority to terminate the compensation advisor and to determine the terms and conditions of their engagement. The compensation advisor reports directly to the ~~committee~~Management Personnel Committee. Mr. Howell may participate in meetings in his role as CEO to provide information to the Management Personnel Committee and answer questions related to management and performance of Gray, but is not present when the Management Personnel Committee goes into executive ~~sessions that are not attended by any of the Company’s officers.~~

session to make executive officer compensation decisions.

Annual Review of Consultant Independence

As a result of the steps taken by the Management Personnel Committee to monitor and manage the independence of its ~~dedicated~~ compensation ~~advisor,~~consultant, the ~~committee~~Management Personnel Committee believes that the advisor is able to provide candid, direct and objective advice to the ~~committee~~Management Personnel Committee that is not influenced by management or any other services provided to Gray by Grant Thornton LLP. Furthermore, neither the compensation advisor nor any member of the advisory team participates in any of the other services provided to Gray by separate Grant Thornton LLP business units. Instead, with full knowledge of the ~~committee,~~Management Personnel Committee, the Audit Committee engages a distinct unit of Grant Thornton LLP to provide all other non-Management Personnel Committee consulting services to ~~the Company,~~Gray, which ~~are~~is primarily related to internal audit services. Grant Thornton LLP provides the Management Personnel Committee with an annual update on its services and related fees. The Management Personnel Committee determines whether the separate services are performed objectively and free from the influence of management. The total amount of fees paid for executive compensation services provided to the committee in 2009 by its dedicated compensation advisor was approximately $10,000. The total amount of fees paid by Gray to Grant Thornton in 2009 for all other services, excluding committee services, was approximately $144,220. The Management Personnel Committee recommended and approved the provision of these separate services to ~~the Company.~~

Gray.

Income Deduction Limitations

Section 162(m) of the IRC generally sets a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that we may deduct for federal income tax purposes in any given year with respect to the compensation of

each of the executive officers. However, certain “performance-based” compensation that complies with the requirements of Section 162(m) is not included in the calculation of the $1 million cap. Historically, tax deductibility of officer compensation has not been a primary objective because of ongoing operating losses on a tax basis and the need for flexibility in pursuing our incentive and retention objectives. ~~However,~~Our executive compensation program historically has not complied with all the requirements of Section 162(m), but the Management Personnel Committee ~~has been working with Grant Thornton LLP~~will review such requirements and will consider ways to ~~explore ways that we can~~ restructure the executive compensation program to satisfy our compensation goals and meet the 162(m) deductibility guidelines ~~in 2010~~going forward. We reserve the right to design compensation plans that recognize a full range of performance and ~~going forward.~~

other criteria important to our success regardless of the federal tax deductibility of compensation paid under those plans.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the other named executive officers for ~~the years ended December 31,~~2011, 2010 and 2009, ~~2008 and 2007.~~

Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Stock Option Compensation All Other
Name and Salary(2) Bonus(3) Awards(4) Awards(5) Earnings(6) Compensation(7) Total
Principal Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)

Hilton H. Howell, Jr. 2009 400,000 — — — 14,839 59,387 474,226
Vice Chairman, Chief 2008 170,765 — 24,700 36,000 16,321 65,174 312,960
Executive Officer 2007 125,000 100,000 36,650 — 8,364 59,405 329,419
and Director(1)

Robert S. Prather, Jr. 2009 950,000 — — — 43,406 103,934 1,097,340
President, 2008 950,000 — 24,700 900,000 47,056 114,294 2,036,050
Chief Operating 2007 900,000 900,000 36,650 — 34,063 106,923 1,977,636
Officer and Director

James C. Ryan 2009 350,000 — — — 14,227 13,571 377,798
Senior Vice President 2008 350,000 — — 135,000 27,442 20,010 532,452
and Chief Financial 2007 325,000 265,000 — — 15,897 13,470 619,367
Officer

Robert A. Beizer 2009 320,000 35,000 — — 17,939 33,792 406,731
Vice President-Law 2008 320,000 — — — 32,706 28,078 380,784
and Development 2007 315,000 30,000 — — 22,944 24,749 392,693
and Secretary

respectively.


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary(1) ($)		Bonus(2) ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Nonequity Incentive Plan Compen- sation(3) ($)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(4) ($)		All Other Compen- sation(5) ($)		Total ($)


Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		2011		500,000		—		—		—		413,181		53,629		54,252		1,021,062
Vice Chairman,		2010		400,000		350,000		—		—		360,000		22,617		63,252		1,195,869
Chief Executive Officer and Director		2009		400,000		—		—		—		—		14,839		59,387		474,226

Robert S. Prather, Jr.		2011		950,000		—		—		—		457,942		50,775		116,928		1,575,645
President,		2010		950,000		350,000		—		—		498,750		38,815		125,424		1,962,989
Chief Operating Officer and Director		2009		950,000		—		—		—		—		43,406		125,934		1,119,340

James C. Ryan		2011		375,000		—		—		—		154,943		84,224		14,478		628,645
Senior Vice		2010		350,000		350,000		—		—		157,500		33,277		14,298		905,075
President and Chief Financial Officer		2009		350,000		—		—		—		—		14,227		13,571		377,798

Robert A. Beizer		2011		350,000		—		—		—		144,613		47,870		22,857		565,340
Vice President-		2010		350,000		—		—		—		157,500		35,967		23,038		566,505
Law and Development and Secretary		2009		320,000		35,000		—		—		—		17,939		33,792		406,731


(1)		~~For 2008, Mr. Howell’s annual base salary was $125,000 from January 1, 2008 until August 2008 when he became Gray’s Chief Executive Officer and his annual base salary was increased to $250,000.~~

~~(2)~~		Each of the ~~named executive officers~~NEOs contributed a portion of his salary to our Capital Accumulation Plan. The disclosed salary amounts are before the ~~named executive officer’s~~NEOs’ contributions.


~~(3)~~(2)		For 2010, Messrs. Howell, Prather and Ryan received bonuses for their work on behalf of the Company in obtaining an amendment of our senior credit facility and the issuance of our 10¹/2% senior secured second lien notes due 2015. For 2009, Mr. Beizer received a bonus of $35,000 as a result of his work on behalf of the Company in obtaining long-term signal carriage agreements with cable and satellite companies. No

(3)

For 2011 and 2010, Messrs. Howell, Prather, Ryan and Beizer received annual ~~cash bonuses were paid in 2009~~incentive compensation for the Company reaching certain predetermined financial performance ~~in 2008. The annual cash bonus amounts~~goals for ~~performance in 2007 were paid in the first quarter of 2008. We accrued these amounts~~2011 and financial and individual goals for ~~financial reporting purposes in 2007.~~2010.

(4)

~~Amounts represent~~Represents for 2011, the ~~fair~~change in pension value, calculated as the difference between the present value of ~~stock grants as of~~accumulated benefits at December 31, 2011, and the date of grant in 2008 and 2007, respectively, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board’s ASC Topic 718 (“ASC 718”). We did not grant any stock to our named executive officers in 2009. Fairpresent value of stock grants is equal to the number of shares granted multiplied by the closing stock price on the date of grant. For additional information with respect to the 2008 and 2007 grants, refer to Note 8 — Stock-Based Compensation in the consolidated audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedaccumulated benefits at December 31, ~~2009.~~


~~(5)~~		~~Amounts represent~~2010, adjusted for benefit payments made during the ~~fair~~year. Represents for 2010, the change in pension value, calculated as the difference between the present value of stock options as of the date of grant in 2008 computed in accordance with ASC 718. We did not grant any stock options to our named executive officers in 2009 or 2007. For additional information on the valuation assumptions with respect to the 2008 grants, refer to Note 8 — Stock-Based Compensation in the consolidated audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedaccumulated benefits at December 31, ~~2009.~~

~~(6)~~		2010, and the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2009, adjusted for benefit payments made during the year. Represents for 2009, the change in pension value, calculated as the difference between the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2009, and the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2008, adjusted for benefit payments made during the year. Represents for 2008, the change in pension value, calculated as the difference between the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2008, and the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2007, adjusted for benefit payments made during the year. Represents for 2007, the change in pension value, calculated as the difference between the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2007, and the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2006, adjusted for benefit payments made during the year. The present values of accumulated benefits at December 31, ~~2009, 2008~~2011, 2010 and ~~2007~~2009 were calculated using the assumptions that were used for the December 31, ~~2009, 2008~~2011, 2010 and ~~2007~~2009 financial statement disclosures, which were the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Tables for the Pension Plan, and the RP 2000 Projected Mortality Table for the Busse Pension Plan, separately for males and females, and a ~~6.27%~~4.84%, ~~5.79%~~5.85% and ~~6.10%~~6.27% interest discount, respectively. See the ~~“Pension~~table in the section entitledPension Benefits ~~in 2009” table~~ herein for additional information, including the present value assumptions used in this calculation.


~~(7)~~(5)		See the ~~“All~~All Other Compensation ~~Table”~~Table below for additional information.

All Other Compensation Table

The following table describes each component of the amounts in the ~~“All~~All Other ~~Compensation”~~Compensation column of the ~~“Summary~~Summary Compensation ~~Table.”~~

Company
Dividends Contributions Company
Paid on Discounted to Defined Paid
Stock Securities Contribution Insurance Directors’
Awards(1) Purchases(2) Plans(3) Premiums(4) Fees(5) Total
Name Year ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)

Hilton H. Howell, Jr. 2009 — 1,832 — 7,555 50,000 59,387
2008 1,890 3,825 6,623 2,836 50,000 65,174
2007 1,920 3,825 5,625 1,035 47,000 59,405

Robert S. Prather, Jr. 2009 — 2,978 — 50,956 50,000 103,934
2008 25,290 3,825 3,840 31,339 50,000 114,294
2007 33,120 3,825 3,557 19,421 47,000 106,923

James C. Ryan 2009 — — — 13,571 — 13,571
2008 — — 7,750 12,260 — 20,010
2007 — — 7,750 5,720 — 13,470

Robert A. Beizer 2009 — — — 33,792 — 33,792
2008 — — 5,247 22,831 — 28,078
2007 — — 6,736 18,013 — 24,749

Tablefor 2011:


Name	Company Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans ($)		Company Paid Insurance Premiums ($)		Directors’ Fees(1) ($)		Total ($)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		—		7,252		47,000		54,252
Robert S. Prather, Jr.		22,000		47,928		47,000		116,928
James C. Ryan		—		14,478		—		14,478
Robert A. Beizer		—		22,857		—		22,857


(1)		Represents dividends paid to each named executive officer in 2008 and 2007, respectively, on all awards of restricted common stock. Messrs. Prather and Howell received grants of restricted common stock in their capacities as directors. Dividends are paid on all shares of restricted stock despite any vesting schedule and in a manner consistent with all other outstanding common shares. We did not declare or pay any dividends on any of our outstanding common stock in 2009.

~~(2)~~		Represents the amount of expense recognized by us, associated with the ESPP, for each named executive officer in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The ESPP was intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the IRC and to provide our eligible employees with an opportunity to purchase our common stock through payroll deductions. The price per share at which shares of common stock were eligible for purchase under the ESPP during 2009, 2008 and 2007 was 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the last day of the purchase period. Effective June 30, 2009, we terminated the ESPP.


~~(3)~~		Represents the amount of expense recognized by us for employer matching contributions during 2008 and 2007, respectively, for the Capital Accumulation Plan for each named executive officer. We did not match employee contributions in 2009. The Capital Accumulation Plan provides additional retirement benefits for substantially all employees. The Capital Accumulation Plan is intended to meet the requirements of Section 401(k) of the IRC. The Capital Accumulation Plan allows an investment option in our common stock and Class A common stock. It also allows for a percentage match to be made by a contribution of our common stock. Employee contributions to the Capital Accumulation Plan, up to 6% of the employees’ gross pay, are matched by our contributions. Our percentage match amount is declared by our Board of Directors before the beginning of each plan year and is made by a contribution of our common stock. Our percentage match was 50% during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. Our matching contributions vest, based upon each employee’s number of years of service, over a period not to exceed five years. In addition to our matching contributions, we authorized voluntary contributions for 2007 for active participants in the Capital Accumulation Plan. These voluntary contributions were equal to 1% of each active participant’s earnings for 2007. Contributions and vesting for the named executive officers are the same as for all other eligible employees.

~~(4)~~		~~Represents insurance premiums paid on behalf of each named executive officer.~~

~~(5)~~		Represents directors’ fees paid to each ~~named executive officer in 2009, 2008 and 2007~~NEO who is also a director. See the ~~“Director~~Director Compensation ~~in 2009”~~ table for additional information.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in ~~2009~~

~~During 2009, no plan-based awards~~2011

Nonequity annual incentive compensation payments were ~~granted~~made to ~~any of~~our NEOs in 2011 based upon the ~~named executive officers.~~

incentive opportunities set forth in the following table.
   Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (1)    Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards    All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying

Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
   Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Name
   Threshold
($)    Target
($)    Maximum
($)    Threshold
(#)    Target
(#)    Maximum
(#)    or Units
(#)    Options
(#)    Awards
($/Sh)    Option
Awards
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.
   150,000       300,000       450,000       —         —         —         —         —         —         —
Robert S. Prather, Jr.
   166,250       332,500       498,750       —         —         —         —         —         —         —
James C. Ryan
   56,250       112,500       168,750       —         —         —         —         —         —         —
Robert A. Beizer
   52,500       105,000       157,500       —         —         —         —         —         —         —
(1) For information on actual payouts under nonequity incentive plan awards for 2011 performance, see the column titled “Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table above.
39

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, ~~2009~~

2011

The following table provides information on the stock option awards and restricted stock awards held by the ~~named executive officers~~NEOs at December 31, ~~2009. Each stock option award is shown separately for each of the named executive officers.~~2011. The stock option award exercise prices shown below are rounded to two decimal points.

Option Awards
Number of Number of
Securities Securities
Underlying Underlying
Unexercised Unexercised Option
Option Options Options Exercise Option
Class Grant Exercisable Unexercisable Price Expiration
Name of Stock Date (#) (#) ($) Date

Hilton H. Howell, Jr. Common 09/20/05 102,887 — 9.71 09/20/10
Common 02/01/08 — 20,000 7.64 02/01/13

Robert S. Prather, Jr. Common 06/08/05 142,899 — 9.71 06/07/10
Common 02/01/08 — 500,000 7.64 02/01/13

James C. Ryan Common 06/08/05 35,725 — 9.71 06/07/10
Common 02/01/08 — 75,000 7.64 02/01/13

Robert A. Beizer — — — — — —

The following table provides information on restricted stock awards held by the named executive officers at December 31, 2009. Each restricted stock award is shown separately for each of the named executive officers. The vesting schedule for each restricted stock award is shown following the stock awards table. The market value of the stock awards is based on our common stock closing market price of ~~$1.51~~$1.62 per share as of December ~~31, 2009, which was the~~30, 2011 (the last trading day of ~~the year.~~

Stock Awards
Market
Number of Value
Shares or of Shares
Units of or Units of
Stock Stock That Stock That
Award Have Not Have Not
Class Grant Vested Vested
Name of Stock Date (#) ($)

Hilton H. Howell, Jr. Common 01/01/06 1,000 1,510
Common 01/01/07 2,000 3,020
Common 03/12/08 3,000 4,530

Robert S. Prather, Jr. Common 01/01/06 1,000 1,510
Common 01/01/07 2,000 3,020
Common 03/12/08 3,000 4,530

James C. Ryan — — — —

Robert A. Beizer — — — —

2011).


	Stock Option Awards (1)										Stock Awards (1) (2)
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock They Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		20,000		—		—		7.64		2/1/2013		1,000		1,620		—		—
Robert S. Prather, Jr.		500,000		—		—		7.64		2/1/2013		1,000		1,620		—		—
James C. Ryan		75,000		—		—		7.64		2/1/2013		—		—		—		—
Robert A. Beizer		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

(1)
~~Grant~~
~~Date~~		~~Vesting Schedule~~All outstanding stock option awards and stock awards are for ~~Stock Awards~~

~~01/01/06~~		~~20% vests in 2006; 20% vests in 2007; 20% vests in 2008; 20% vests in 2009; 20% vests in 2010~~
~~01/01/07~~		~~20% vests in 2007; 20% vests in 2008; 20% vests in 2009; 20% vests in 2010; 20% vests in 2011~~
~~03/12/08~~		~~20% vests in 2008; 20% vests in 2009; 20% vests in 2010; 20% vests in 2011; 20% vests in 2012~~common stock.

(2)	Awards vest in five equal, annual installments beginning on the last day of the year they were granted.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in ~~2009~~

2011

The following table provides information, for the ~~named executive officers,~~NEOs, on the number of shares of stock awards vested in ~~2009~~2011 and the value realized by each before payment of any applicable withholding tax.

Option Awards Stock Awards
Number Number
of Shares Value of Shares Value
Acquired Realized Acquired Realized
Class on Exercise on Exercise on Vesting on Vesting
Name of Stock (#) ($) (#) ($)

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.(1) Common — — 3,000 4,530

Robert S. Prather, Jr.(1) Common — — 3,000 4,530

James C. Ryan — — — — —

Robert A. Beizer — — — — —


			Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Class of Stock		Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise ($)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.(1)		Common		—		—		2,000		3,240
Robert S. Prather, Jr.(1)		Common		—		—		2,000		3,240
James C. Ryan		—		—		—		—		—
Robert A. Beizer		—		—		—		—		—


(1)		Messrs. Howell and Prather each acquired ~~3,000~~2,000 shares of common stock having a market value of ~~$1.51~~$1.62 per share on December ~~31, 2009~~30, 2011 when the restrictions on those shares lapsed.

Pension Benefits

Messrs. Howell, Prather, Ryan and Beizer participate in the Pension Plan. The Pension Plan, which is intended to be tax qualified, is available to certain of our employees and the employees of all of our subsidiaries that have been designated as participating companies under the plan.

A participating employee who retires on or after attaining age 65 and who has completed five years of service upon retirement may be eligible to receive during his or her lifetime, in the form of monthly payments, an annual pension equal to (i) 22% of the employee’s average earnings for the highest five consecutive years during the employee’s final ten years of employment multiplied by a factor, the numerator of which is the employee’s years of service credited under the plan before 1994 and the denominator of which is the greater of 25 or the years of service credited under the plan, plus (ii) 0.9% of the employee’s monthly average earnings for the highest five consecutive years in the employee’s final ten years of employment added to 0.6% of monthly average earnings in excess of Social Security covered compensation, multiplied by the employee’s years of service credited under the plan after 1993, with a maximum of 25 years minus years of service credited under (i) above. For participants as of December 31, 1993, there is a minimum benefit equal to the projected benefit under (i) at that time.

In addition, Mr. Ryan would receive retirement benefits paid by ~~the Company~~Gray under a pension plan with Mr. Ryan’s former employer, Busse Broadcasting Corporation (the “Busse Pension Plan”), which benefit amounts have been frozen since September 1997. The Company acquired Busse Broadcasting Corporation in July ~~1998.~~

1998 and the Busse Pension Plan was assumed in that transaction.

Our NEOs did not receive any pension benefit payments in 2011. The following table shows the years of credited service and the present value of accumulated benefits ~~and the benefit payments received (if any) during 2009~~as of December 31, 2011 for the ~~named executive officers:~~

Payments
Number Present During
of Years Value of Last
Credited Accumulated Fiscal
Se rvice(1) Benefit(2) Year
Name (#) Plan Name ($) ($)

Hilton H. Howell, Jr. 7 Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan 54,973 —
Robert S. Prather, Jr. 8 Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan 235,006 —
James C. Ryan 11 Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan 107,821 —
Busse Pension Plan 55,500 —
Robert A. Beizer 14 Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan 364,484 —

NEOs:


Name	Number of Years Credited Service(1) (#)	Plan Name	Present Value of Accumulated Benefit(2) ($)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.	9	Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan		131,219
Robert S. Prather, Jr.	10	Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan		324,597
James C. Ryan	13	Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan		205,782
	9	Busse Pension Plan		75,040
Robert A. Beizer	16	Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan		448,322


(1)		Computed as of the same ~~Pension Plan~~ measurement date as used for ~~2009~~2011 financial statement reporting purposes.

(2)

The Present Value of Accumulated Benefit was calculated using the assumptions that were used for ~~2009~~2011 financial statement reporting purposes, which were the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Tables for the Pension Plan, and the RP 2000 Projected Mortality Table for the Busse Pension Plan, separately for males and females, and a ~~6.27%~~4.84% interest discount rate.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

The ~~named executive officers~~NEOs do not have employment agreements or agreements with us that provide severance in the event of a change in control, except to the extent that the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, the ~~Director’s~~Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan, the Pension Plan, ~~and~~ the Capital Accumulation Plan and the Busse Pension Plan contain such provisions that are applicable to all participants. The information below describes and quantifies certain compensation that would become payable under existing plans, policies and arrangements if the ~~named executive officer’s~~NEO’s employment had terminated (by virtue of involuntary termination, death, disability, voluntary termination or change of control) on December 31, ~~2009,~~2011, given the ~~named executive officer’s~~NEO’s compensation and service levels as of such date and, if applicable, based on our closing stock price on ~~that date.~~December 30, 2011 (the last trading day of 2011). These benefits are in addition to benefits available generally to salaried employees, such as distributions under the Pension Plan, Busse Pension Plan, Capital Accumulation Plan, disability benefits, life insurance and accrued vacation pay.

Involuntary Voluntary Change of
Termination(1)(2) Death(1)(3) Disability(1)(4) Termination(1)(2) Control(1)(5)
Name ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)

Hilton H. Howell, Jr. 70,358 1,051,932 1,321,418 70,358 79,418
Robert S. Prather, Jr. 289,814 2,181,371 1,250,190 289,814 298,874
James C. Ryan 190,244 1,936,334 1,324,244 190,244 190,244
Robert A. Beizer 20,192 902,934 92,442 20,192 20,192

The following table sets forth the amounts that would be owed by Gray to our NEOs as of December 31, 2011 if they were terminated as a result of involuntary termination, death, disability, voluntary termination or change of control:


Name	Involuntary Termination(1)(2) ($)		Death(1)(3) ($)		Disability(1)(4) ($)		Voluntary Termination(1)(2) ($)		Change of Control(1)(5) ($)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		154,296		1,090,307		2,885,916		154,296		155,916
Robert S. Prather, Jr.		73,077		2,236,996		268,185		73,077		74,697
James C. Ryan		313,130		2,010,239		2,791,130		313,130		313,130
Robert A. Beizer		26,923		951,584		102,211		26,923		26,923


(1)		Gray does not have a formal severance policy for its ~~named executive officers.~~NEOs. At the time of a separation from service for any reason, the Board ~~of Directors~~ will use its discretion to determine each executive’s severance payment, if any. The amounts reported above reflect any accrued and unpaid benefits payable to the executive officer in addition to payment identified in plan documents and insurance policies.

(2)		Includes each ~~named executive officer’s~~NEO’s accrued and unpaid vacation payable upon termination and the present value of accumulated benefits from their pension plan(s) as determined by the plan’s actuary.

(3)		Includes each ~~named executive officer’s~~NEO’s accrued and unpaid vacation payable upon termination, the death benefit of their basic and supplemental life insurance coverage, the present value of the accumulated benefits from their pension plan(s) as determined by the plan’s actuary, and accelerated vesting of 100% of their unvested restricted stock awards and stock options. The life insurance benefit reflects the payment of the death benefit by the insurance company for which ~~the Company~~Gray has been paying premiums on behalf of the ~~executive officer.~~NEO.

(4)		Includes each ~~named executive officer’s~~NEO’s accrued and unpaid vacation payable upon termination, the amount of long-term disability payments, the present value of accumulated benefits from their pension plan(s) as determined by the plan’s actuary, and accelerated vesting of 100% of their unvested restricted stock awards and stock options. ~~Executive officers~~NEOs are entitled to monthly long-term disability payments from the time of disability through age 65. ~~Because Mr. Beizer is beyond 65 years of age, he would receive 17 months of long-term disability payments from the time of disability.~~

(5)

Includes each ~~named executive officer’s~~NEO’s accrued and unpaid vacation payable upon termination, the present value of accumulated benefits from their pension plan(s) as determined by the plan’s actuary, and accelerated vesting of 100% of their unvested restricted stock awards and stock options.

For the purposes of this discussion, “disability” generally means total disability, resulting in the grantee being unable to perform his job, and “change of control” means any of the following: (1) any person becomes the beneficial owner of 45% or more of the combined voting power of our then outstanding shares; (2) during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board ~~of Directors~~ cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, unless the election of such new directors was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then still in office who were directors at the beginning of the period; (3) there is consummated any consolidation or acquisition in which we are not the continuing or surviving corporation or pursuant to which shares of our common stock are converted into cash, securities or other property; (4) there is consummated any consolidation or acquisition of us, in which we are the continuing corporation, in which the holders of our common stock immediately prior to the acquisition do not own 51% percent or more of the stock of the surviving corporation immediately after the acquisition; (5) there is consummated any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of substantially all our assets; or (6) our shareholders approve any plan or proposal for our liquidation or dissolution.

If one of the ~~named executive officers~~NEOs were to die or become disabled, or if there were to be a change in control, any unexercisable stock options granted before the date of that event would become exercisable and remain exercisable until the later of one year from the date of death or the expiration date of the grant.

The ~~Director’s~~Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan provides that any remaining restrictions on awards of restricted stock generally lapse upon the death or disability of the ~~named executive officer,~~NEO, and in the event of a change of control, all shares of restricted stock will ~~become~~ immediately ~~and fully transferable, and all periods~~be free of restriction, ~~will expire,~~ and the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee, which administers the ~~Director’s~~Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan, will be deemed to waive any forfeiture provisions provided with respect to any award. As of December 31, ~~2009,~~2011, the ~~named executive officers~~NEOs did not hold any option awards with intrinsic value (that is, their options had an exercise price in excess of our common stock price) that were exercisable or would have become exercisable or vested if the ~~named executive officer~~NEO had died or become disabled, or if there had been a change of control, based upon the closing price of our common stock on ~~such date.~~

the last trading date of 2011.

Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon the events discussed, actual amounts paid or distributed may be different than as disclosed. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of any such event or our stock price.

Director Compensation

The current compensation and benefit program for directors is designed to fairly pay directors for time and effort required to be an effective director of a company of our size and scope; to align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of shareholders; and to be simple, transparent and easy for shareholders to understand. Our directors’ compensation for ~~2009~~2011 included the following compensation elements:


Description			Amount ($)
~~Description~~	~~Amount ($)~~

Chairman of the Board’s annual retainer fee		40,000
Director’s annual retainer fee		35,000
Chairman of the Board fee per board meeting		4,000
Director’s fee per board meeting		3,000
Audit Committee chairman fee per committee meeting		4,000
Audit Committee member fee per committee meeting		3,500
Other Committee chairman fee per committee meeting		3,000
Other Committee member fee per committee meeting		3,000

Directors are generally paid the above fee arrangement for participation in person or by telephone in any meeting of the Board ~~of Directors~~ or any committee thereof.

In addition, we adopted the ~~Director’s~~Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan in 2003. Pursuant to that plan, we may grant our directors restricted shares of our common stock that vest over five years in equal annual increments. Under the ~~Director’s~~Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan, a maximum of 10,000 restricted shares of common stock may be granted to each director in any calendar year.

We did not grant any restricted shares to our directors in 2011.

Director Compensation in ~~2009~~

2011

The table below presents the directors’ compensation for ~~2009:~~

Change in
Pension
Value and
Fees Nonqualified
Earned or Deferred
Paid in Compensation All Other
Cash(1) Earnings(2) Compensation(3) Total
Name ($) ($) ($) ($)

William E. Mayher, III
Chairman of the Board of Directors
80,000 — — 80,000
Richard L. Boger 64,000 — — 64,000
Ray M. Deaver 56,000 — — 56,000
T. L. Elder 64,000 — — 64,000
Hilton H. Howell, Jr. 50,000 14,839 9,387 74,226
Zell B. Miller 53,000 — — 53,000
Howell W . Newton 66,000 — — 66,000
Hugh E. Norton 56,000 — — 56,000
Robert S. Prather, Jr. 50,000 43,406 53,934 147,340
Harriett J. Robinson 50,000 — — 50,000
J. Mack Robinson 50,000 — 400,000 450,000

2011:


Name(1)	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(2) ($)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(3) ($)		All Other Compensation(4) ($)		Total ($)
William E. Mayher, III Chairman of the Board of Directors		79,500		—		—		79,500
Richard L. Boger		64,500		—		—		64,500
Ray M. Deaver		53,000		—		—		53,000
T. L. Elder		64,500		—		—		64,500
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		47,000		53,629		7,252		107,881
Zell B. Miller		44,250		—		—		44,250
Howell W. Newton		67,000		—		—		67,000
Hugh E. Norton		53,000		—		—		53,000
Robert S. Prather, Jr.		47,000		50,775		69,928		167,703
Harriett J. Robinson		47,000		—		—		47,000
J. Mack Robinson		47,000		—		—		47,000


(1)	As of December 31, 2011 and except for Senator Miller, each director owned 1,000 restricted shares of Gray common stock that he or she had received under our Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan.

(2)	For all directors, this amount represents cash compensation earned in ~~2009~~2011 for Board ~~of Directors~~ and committee service.


~~(2)~~(3)		Represents the change in pension value, calculated as the difference between the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, ~~2009~~2011 and the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, ~~2008,~~2010, adjusted for benefit payments made during the year. The present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, ~~2009~~2011 was calculated using the assumptions that were used for the December 31, ~~2009~~2011 financial statement disclosures, which were the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table, separately for males and females, and a ~~6.27%~~4.84% interest discount. The present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, ~~2008~~2010 was calculated using the assumptions that were used for the December 31, ~~2008~~2010 financial statement disclosures, which were the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table, separately for males and females, and a ~~5.79%~~5.85% interest discount. See the ~~“Pension~~table in the section entitledPension Benefits ~~in 2009” table~~ herein for additional information, including the present value assumptions used in this calculation.

(4)
~~(3)~~		Represents all other compensation earned by the named director. For descriptions of the other compensation earned by Mr. Howell and Mr. Prather, refer to the amounts in the ~~“All~~All Other Compensation Table”, with the exception of directors’ fees, which are reported separately in this ~~“Director~~Director Compensation in ~~2009”~~2011 table. ~~For~~

(5)	Retired from the Board effective December 7, 2011.

(6)	Mr. Robinson ~~it also includes a consulting fee of $400,000 as discussed below in “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”~~is retiring from the Board at the 2012 Annual Meeting.

The members of our Board ~~of Directors~~ are reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses incurred by them during the execution of their duties as members of our Board ~~of Directors~~ and any committees. These expenses include but are not limited to mileage, hotel rooms, meals and air transportation.

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL COMMITTEE

The following Report of the Management Personnel Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by Gray under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent Gray specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

The Management Personnel Committee, acting in its capacity as the Compensation Committee, has reviewed and discussed the ~~“Compensation~~Compensation Discussion and ~~Analysis”~~Analysis contained in this ~~Proxy Statement~~proxy statement with management and, based on such review and discussion, the Management Personnel Committee has recommended to the Board ~~of Directors~~ that the ~~“Compensation~~Compensation Discussion and ~~Analysis”~~Analysis be included herein and in Gray’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2009.~~

2011.

The Management Personnel Committee has retained Grant Thornton LLP to advise it on current trends and best practices in compensation. The total amount of fees paid by Gray to Grant Thornton for executive compensation services provided as a dedicated compensation advisor to the ~~committee~~Management Personnel Committee in ~~2009~~2011 was approximately ~~$10,000.~~$66,002. The total amount of fees paid toby Gray to Grant Thornton LLP in ~~2009~~2011 for all other services, excluding ~~committee~~Management Personnel Committee services, was approximately ~~$144,220,~~$135,480, which related ~~primarily~~ to internal audit services. The Management Personnel Committee recommended and approved the provision of these additional services to ~~the Company~~Gray by Grant Thornton LLP.

Submitted by the Management Personnel Committee of the ~~Board of Directors.~~

~~Ray M. Deaver, Chairman~~
~~William E. Mayher, III~~
~~Zell B. Miller~~
~~Hugh E. Norton~~

Board.
Ray M. Deaver, Chairman
William E. Mayher, III
Hugh E. Norton
46

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Messrs. Deaver, Mayher ~~Miller~~ and Norton are the current members of the Management Personnel Committee, which serves as our Compensation Committee. In 2011, prior to his retirement, Mr. Miller also served as a member of the Management Personnel Committee. No member of the Management Personnel Committee was an employee or officer of Gray or any of its subsidiaries during ~~2009~~2011 or was formerly an officer of Gray or any of its subsidiaries, except that Mr. Deaver served as Gray’s Regional Vice President-Texas from October 1999 until his retirement in December 2001. He was the President and General Manager of KWTX Broadcasting Company and President of Brazos Broadcasting Company from November 1997 until their acquisition by Gray in October 1999. ~~Mr. Norton had an immaterial business relationship with Gray during 2009 as described under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”~~ No ~~“compensation~~compensation committee ~~interlocks”~~interlocks existed during ~~2009.~~

2011.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We obtain certain liability, umbrella and workers’ compensation insurance coverages through Insurance Associates of Georgia, an insurance agency that is owned by a son-in-law of Hugh E. Norton, one of our directors. During 2009,

The Company was not party to any related party transactions required to be disclosed in connection with these coverages, Insurance Associates of Georgia retained commissions of $130,577 paid to it by the various insurance companies providing insurance to us and paid $96,640 of such commissions to Norco Holdings, Inc., an insurance agency, of which Mr. Norton is President and which is owned by Mr. Norton’s wife and daughter. The Board of Directors has reviewed these arrangements and has determined that, notwithstanding these payments, Mr. Norton is independent in accordance with Section 303A.02(b) of the NYSE listing standards and the standards set forth in the IRC and the Exchange Act as further explained under the heading “Corporate Governance.”

In December 2008, Gray entered into a consulting contract with Mr. Robinson in which he agreed to consult and advise Gray with respect to its television stations and all related matters in connection with various proposed or existing television stations. In return for his services, Mr. Robinson received compensation of $400,000. Mr. Robinson served as Gray’s Chief Executive Officer until his resignation in August 2008 and he continues to serve as a member of Gray’s Board of Directors and as Chairman Emeritus.

this proxy statement.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the directors, executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of a company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership (Form 3) and reports of changes in ownership (Forms 4 and 5) of such class of equity securities. Such officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders of a company are required by SEC regulations to furnish the company with copies of all such Section 16(a) reports that they file.

To our knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of such reports filed with the SEC during the year ended December 31, ~~2009,~~2011, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and ten percent beneficial owners were ~~met, except that ten percent shareholder Highland Capital Management, LP failed to timely file two Form 4 reports for a total of five transactions.~~

met.

REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE

The following Report of the Audit Committee, together with references in this ~~Proxy Statement~~proxy statement to the independence of the Audit Committee members and the Audit Committee Charter, does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by Gray under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent Gray specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

The Audit Committee of our Board ~~of Directors~~ is comprised of four directors who are independent and financially literate in accordance with the NYSE listing standards and ~~the~~ SEC rules regarding audit committees. In addition, the Board ~~of Directors~~ has determined that T. L. Elder is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC rules. Our identification of Mr. Elder as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on him any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liabilities imposed on the other members of the audit committee. In accordance with its written charter, which was approved and adopted in its current form by our Board ~~of Directors~~ in June 2009, the Audit Committee assists our Board ~~of Directors~~ in the oversight of the quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices of Gray. In addition, the Audit Committee has the

authority to select our independent registered public accounting firm. Gray’s Audit Committee Charter prohibits a member of the Audit Committee from serving on more than three public company audit committees.

Management has primary responsibility for Gray’s financial statements and the overall reporting process, including Gray’s system of internal controls. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, audits the annual consolidated financial statements prepared by management and expresses an opinion on whether those statements fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Audit Committee has reviewed our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2011 and discussed them with both management and McGladrey & Pullen, LLP.

Management is responsible for establishing, assessing and reporting on Gray’s system of internal control over financial reporting. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is responsible for performing an independent audit of Gray’s internal control over financial reporting and to issue a report thereon. The Audit Committee is responsible for the monitoring and oversight of this process. In connection with these responsibilities, the Audit Committee met with management and McGladrey & Pullen, LLP to review and discuss the effectiveness of Gray’s internal controls over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee has also discussed with McGladrey & Pullen, LLP the matters required to be discussed by generally accepted auditing standards, including those described in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended, issued by the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from McGladrey & Pullen, LLP consistent with the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed and confirmed with McGladrey & Pullen, LLP its independence with respect to Gray. In addition, the Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the non-audit services provided by McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is compatible with maintaining that independence.

Based upon this review, the Audit Committee recommended to the full Board ~~of Directors~~ that our audited consolidated financial statements be included in Gray’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2011 and filed with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the ~~Board of Directors.~~

Board.

Howell W. Newton, Chairman

Richard L. Boger

T. L. Elder

William E. Mayher, III

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

McGladrey & Pullen, LLP has been our independent registered public accounting firm since May 2006. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP audited our annual financial statements for each of the years ended December 31, ~~2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006.~~2006 through December 31, 2011. As approved by our Audit Committee, we have ~~selected~~appointed McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting for the year ending December 31, ~~2010.~~2012. A representative of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is expected to be present at the ~~2010~~2012 Annual Meeting, and will have the opportunity to make a statement, if he or she desires to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. We have decided ~~not~~ to ask our shareholders to ratify the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, ~~2010.~~

2012.

Fees

The fees billed by McGladrey & Pullen, LLP for ~~2009~~2011 and ~~2008~~2010 were as follows:

2009 2008
($) ($)
Audit fees(1) 831,381 952,321
Audit-related fees(2) 99,257 89,096
Tax fees — —
All other fees — —

Total 930,638 1,041,417


	2011 ($)		2010 ($)
Audit fees(1)		800,915		823,637
Audit-related fees(2)		108,181		107,631
Tax fees		—		—
All other fees(3)		30,000		46,350

Total		939,096		977,618


(1)		Audit fees include fees for the current year audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, fees for quarterly reviews of our reports on Form 10-Q and consultation concerning accounting issues discussed with the SEC when applicable.

(2)

~~These~~Audit related fees were for audits of our employee benefit plans.

(3)	All other fees were for services provided in connection with various financing activities.

All audit related services, tax services and other non-audit services must be, and all ofsuch services and the expenses for such services in ~~2009~~2011 and ~~2008~~2010 were, pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which also concluded that the provision of such services was compatible with the maintenance of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

In accordance with its written charter, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, on a periodic basis, any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm and pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed for us by our independent registered public accounting firm.

~~EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION~~

The following table gives information about the common stock and Class A common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2009.

~~Equity Compensation Plan Information~~

Number of securities remaining
Number of securities to available for future issuance
be issued upon exercise under equity compensation
of outstanding options, Weighted average plans (excluding securities
warrants and rights exercise price of reflected in 1st column)
(in thousands) outstanding options (in thousands)
Plan Category (#) warrants and rights (#)

Common Stock:

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)(2) 1,476 $ 8.28 7,392

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders — $ — —

Total 1,476 7,392

Class A Common Stock:

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) — $ — 1,000

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders — $ — —

Total — 1,000


~~(1)~~		Under our 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, we are authorized to issue options to acquire an additional 4,979,300 shares of either our common stock or our class A common stock; however, of this amount, we cannot grant options to acquire in excess of 1,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock. For purposes of this disclosure, we have assumed the issuance of options to acquire 4,979,300 shares of our common stock and 1,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock.

~~(2)~~		Includes 1,642,849 shares of our common stock that are issuable under our Capital Accumulation Plan, which is intended to meet the requirements of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Includes 770,000 shares of our common stock that are issuable under our Director’s Restricted Stock Plan.

OTHER MATTERS

Our Board ~~of Directors~~ knows of no other matters to be brought before the ~~2010~~2012 Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters are properly brought before the ~~2010~~2012 Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the named proxies in the accompanying proxy to vote in accordance with their judgment on such matters.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR INCLUSION

IN NEXT YEAR’S PROXY STATEMENT

Proposals of shareholders intended to be presented at our ~~2011~~2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received at our principal executive offices by December ~~29, 2010,~~20, 2012, in order to be eligible for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy for that meeting.

OTHER SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR PRESENTATION

AT NEXT YEAR’S ANNUAL MEETING

For any proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement, but is instead sought to be presented directly at the ~~2011~~2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, management will be able to vote proxies in its discretion if we: (1) receive notice of the proposal before the close of business on March ~~25, 2011~~5, 2013 and advise shareholders in the ~~2011~~2013 proxy statement about the nature of the matter and how management intends to vote on such matter; or (2) receive notice of the proposal after the close of business on March ~~25, 2011.~~5, 2013. Notices of intention to present proposals at the ~~2011~~2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders should be addressed to Gray Television, Inc., Attention: ~~Robert A. Beizer, Secretary, 1750 K Street, NW, Suite 1200, Washington, D.C.~~Kevin Latek, Vice President Law and Development, Gray Television, Inc., ~~20006.~~

4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319.

AVAILABILITY OF FORM 10-K

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K is available online atwww.gray.tv in the “SEC Filings” section. We will provide to any shareholder, without charge, upon written request, a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2009,~~2011, as filed with the SEC. Such requests should be addressed to Gray Television, Inc., 4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319, Attention: Investor Relations.

HOUSEHOLDING

As permitted under the Exchange Act, to the extent shareholders receive a hard copy of the proxy by mail, only one copy of this proxy statement is being delivered to shareholders residing at the same address, unless such shareholders have notified us of their desire to receive multiple copies of this proxy statement. We will promptly deliver, upon oral or written request, a separate copy of this proxy statement to any shareholder residing at an address to which only one copy was mailed. Requests for additional copies should be directed to Gray Television, Inc., 4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319, Attention: Investor ~~Relations.~~Relations, telephone (404) 266-8333. Shareholders residing at the same address and currently receiving only one copy of the proxy statement may contact Investor Relations at the address above to request multiple copies of the proxy statement in the future. Shareholders residing at the same address and currently receiving multiple copies of the proxy statement may contact Investor Relations at the address above to request that only a single copy of the proxy statement by mailed in the future.

Appendix A

GRAY TELEVISION, INC.
~~4370 PEACHTREE ROAD, N.E.~~
~~ATLANTA, GA 30319~~

~~VOTE BY INTERNET -~~ ~~www.proxyvote.com~~
~~Use~~

2007 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Section 1. Establishment and Purpose.

Gray Television, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), hereby establishes this long term incentive plan to be named the ~~Internet~~Gray Television, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for certain Employees and Directors (as such terms are defined below in Section 2) of the Company and its subsidiaries. The purpose of this Plan is to ~~transmit your voting instructions~~encourage certain Employees and Directors of the Company, and of such subsidiaries of the Company as the committee administering the Plan designates, to acquire Common Stock of the Company or to receive monetary payments based on the value of such stock or based upon achieving certain goals on a basis mutually advantageous to such Employees and Directors and the Company and thus provide an incentive for continuation of the efforts of Employees and Directors for the success of the Company and for ~~electronic~~continuity of employment and service.

Section 2. Definitions.

Whenever used herein, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below:

(a)Actmeans the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.

(b)Awardmeans any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock, or Performance Award granted under the Plan.

(c)Award Agreementmeans an agreement entered into by the Company and each Participant setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to Awards granted under this Plan.

(d)Base Pricemeans, in the case of an Option or a Stock Appreciation Right, a price fixed by the Committee at which the Option or the Stock Appreciation Right may be exercised which shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of grant of such option or right.

(e)Boardmeans the Board of Directors of the Company.

(f)Change of Controlis defined in Section 14.

(g)Codemeans the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect from time to time.

(h)Committeemeans a committee or subcommittee of the Board that shall administer the Plan, which committee or subcommittee shall consist of no fewer than two members, each of whom shall be a “nonemployee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 (or any successor rule or regulation) promulgated under the Act, and an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m)(4)(C)(i) of the Code.

(i)Covered Employeemeans a Participant who, as of the date of vesting and/or payout of an Award, as applicable, is one of the group of “covered employees,” as defined in the regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) of the Code, or any successor statute.

(j)Director means any individual who is a member of the Board or board of directors of any member of the Group; provided, however, that any such member who is employed by any member of the Group shall be considered an Employee under this Plan.

A-1

(k) Disabilitymeans permanent and total disability as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code, as determined by the Committee in good faith, upon receipt of and in reliance on sufficient competent medical advice.

(l)Employeemeans an employee (including officers and directors who are also employees) of any member of the Group.

(m)Fair Market Valuemeans, for any particular date, (i) for any period during which the Stock shall not be listed for trading on a national securities exchange, but when prices for the Stock shall be reported by the National Market System of the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (“NASDAQ”), the last transaction price per share as quoted by the National Market System of NASDAQ, (ii) for any period during which the Stock shall not be listed for trading on a national securities exchange or its price reported by the National Market System of NASDAQ, but when prices for the Stock shall be reported by NASDAQ, the closing bid price as reported by the NASDAQ, (iii) for any period during which the Stock shall be listed for trading on a national securities exchange, the closing price per share of stock on such exchange as of the close of such trading day or (iv) the market price per share of Stock as determined by a nationally recognized investment banking firm selected by the Board of Directors determined in accordance with a reasonable valuation method as determined under Code Section 409A and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder in the event neither (i), (ii) or (iii) above shall be applicable. If Market Price is to be determined as of a day when the securities markets are not open, the Market Price on that day shall be the Market Price on the preceding day when the markets were open.

(n)Groupmeans the Company and every Subsidiary of the Company.

(o)Optionmeans the right to purchase Stock at the Base Price for a specified period of time. For purposes of the Plan, an Option may be an “Incentive Stock Option” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, a “Nonqualified Stock Option,” or any other type of stock option encompassed by the Code.

(p)Participantmeans any Employee or Director designated by the Committee to participate in the Plan.

(q)Performance Awardmeans a right to receive a payment equal to the value of a unit or other measure as determined by the Committee based on performance during a Performance Period.

(r)Performance-Based Exceptionmeans the performance-based exception from the tax deductibility limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code.

(s)Performance Periodmeans a period of not more than ten years established by the Committee during which certain performance goals set by the Committee are to be met.

(t)Period of Restrictionmeans the period during which a grant of shares of Restricted Stock is restricted pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan.

(u)Reporting Personmeans a person subject to Section 16 of the Act.

(v)Restricted Stockmeans Stock granted pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan, but a share of such Stock shall cease to be Restricted Stock when the conditions to and limitations on transferability under Section 11 have been satisfied or have expired, respectively.

(w)Retirement(including Normal, Early, and Disability Retirement) means termination of employment with eligibility for normal, early or disability retirement benefits under the terms of the Gray Television, Inc. Pension Plan, as amended and in effect at the time of such termination of employment.

A-2

(x)Stockmeans the authorized and unissued shares of the Company’s class A common stock and common stock or shares of the Company’s class A common stock or common stock held in treasury or previously issued shares of class A common stock or common stock reacquired by the Company, including stock purchased on the open market. The Company’s class A common stock and common stock are substantially similar except for differences in voting rights.

(y)Stock Appreciation RightorSARmeans the right to receive a payment from the Company equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock at the date of exercise over the Base Price. In the case of a Stock Appreciation Right which is granted in conjunction with an Option, the Base Price shall be the Option exercise price.

(z)Subsidiarymeans a subsidiary corporation as defined in Section 425 of the Code.

Section 3. Administration.

The Plan will be administered by the Committee. The determinations of the Committee shall be made in accordance with their judgment as to the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and in accordance with the purpose of the Plan. A majority of members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum, and all determinations of the Committee shall be made by a majority of its members. Any determination of the Committee under the Plan may be made without notice or meeting of the Committee, by a writing signed by a majority of the Committee members. Determinations, interpretations, or other actions made or taken by the Committee pursuant to the provisions of the Plan shall be final and binding and conclusive for all purposes and upon all persons whomsoever. The Committee shall have the authority to delegate administrative duties to one or more officers or Employees of the Company or Subsidiaries to the extent that such delegation would not jeopardize the Performance-Based Exception with respect to any Award or otherwise violate applicable law or exchange act rules.

Section 4. Shares Reserved Under the Plan.

There is hereby reserved for issuance under the Plan an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares of Stock with no more than 1,000,000 of the aggregate limit consisting of class A common stock. The above amounts include approximately 2,469,000 shares of Stock that were available for issuance under the 2002 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”), and were transferred to the Plan, added to the reserved Stock and available for issuance to Participants under the Plan. No new Awards shall be made under the 2002 Plan as of the effective date of the Plan. Stock underlying Awards under the 2002 Plan that expire, are cancelled, or are forfeited after the effective date of the Plan may not be added back to the Plan maximum.

Stock underlying outstanding Options or Performance Awards will be counted against the Plan maximum while such Options or Performance Awards are outstanding. Shares underlying expired, canceled or forfeited Awards (except Restricted Stock) may be added back to the Plan maximum. When the exercise price of an Option is paid by delivery of ~~information up~~shares of Stock, the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan shall continue to be reduced by the gross (rather than the net) number of shares issued pursuant to such exercise, regardless of the number of shares surrendered in payment. The full number of Stock Appreciation Rights granted that are to be settled in Common Stock shall be counted against the number of Shares available for award under the Plan, regardless of the number of Shares actually issued upon settlement of such Stock Appreciation Rights. Restricted Stock issued pursuant to the Plan will be counted against the Plan maximum while outstanding even while subject to restrictions.

Unless and until ~~11:59 P.M. Eastern Time~~ the Committee determines that an Award to a Covered Employee shall not be designed to comply with the Performance-Based Exception, the following rules shall apply to grants of such Awards under the Plan:

A-3

(a)

Stock Options:The maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be granted in the form of Options, pursuant to any Award granted in any one fiscal year to any one single Participant shall be 500,000 shares.

(b)

SARs:The maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be granted in the form of Stock Appreciation Rights, pursuant to any Award granted in any one fiscal year to any one single Participant shall be 500,000 shares.

(c)

Performance Awards:The maximum aggregate payout (determined as of the end of the applicable performance period) with respect to Performance Awards granted in any one fiscal year to any one Participant shall be the greater of $1,000,000 or 500,000 shares.

If any Award is cancelled (or is amended in a way that is treated as a cancellation), the shares related to the cancelled Award shall count against the above maximum limitations for the applicable fiscal year.

Section 5. Participants.

Participants will consist of such Employees and Directors of the Company or any designated subsidiary as the Committee in its sole discretion determines have a major impact on the success and future growth and profitability of the Company. Designation of a Participant in any year shall not require the Committee to designate such person to receive an Award in any other year or to receive the same type or amount of Award as granted to the Participant in any other year or as granted to any other Participant in any year. The Committee shall consider such factors as it deems pertinent in selecting Participants and in determining the type and amount of their respective Awards. Only key Employees may be granted Incentive Stock Options under the Plan.

Section 6. Types of Awards.

The following Awards may be granted under the Plan: (a) Incentive Stock Options; (b) Nonqualified Stock Options; (c) Stock Appreciation Rights; (d) Restricted Stock; and (e) Performance Awards; all as described below. Except as specifically limited herein, the Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the type and number of Awards to be granted to any Participant, and the terms and conditions which attach to each Award, which terms and conditions need not be uniform as between different participants. All Awards shall be in writing.

Section 7. Date of Granting Awards.

The date of grant of an Award (the “Award Date”) is the date the Committee makes the Award to a Participant by fixing the material terms of the Award. Promptly after each Award Date, the Company shall notify the Participant of the grant of the Award, and shall hand deliver or mail to the Participant an Award Agreement, duly executed by and on behalf of the Company, with the request that the Participant execute and return the Award Agreement within thirty days after the date of mailing or delivery by the Company of the Award Agreement to the Participant. If the Participant shall fail to execute and return the written Award Agreement within said thirty day ~~before~~period, his or her Award shall be automatically terminated, except that if the ~~meeting date. Have your proxy card~~Participant dies within said thirty day period such Award Agreement shall be effective notwithstanding the fact that it has not been signed prior to death.

Section 8. Incentive Stock Options.

Incentive Stock Options shall consist of options to purchase shares of Stock at purchase prices determined by the Committee but not less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the shares of Stock on the date of grant of the Option. Said purchase price may be paid by check or, in ~~hand~~the discretion of the

A-4

Committee, by the delivery of shares of Stock then owned by the Participant. Incentive Stock Options will be exercisable as provided in the Award Agreement and, except as provided below, will terminate not later than three months after termination of employment for any reason other than death or disability. In the event termination of employment occurs as a result of death or Disability, such an option will be exercisable for 12 months after such termination. If the optionee dies within 12 months after termination of employment by reason of Disability, then the period of exercise following death shall be the remainder of the 12-month period, or three months, whichever is longer. If the optionee dies within three months after termination of employment for any other reason, then the period of exercise following death shall be three months. However, in no event shall any Incentive Stock Option be exercised more than ten years after its grant. Leaves of absence granted by the Company for military service, illness, and transfers of employment between the Company and any subsidiary thereof shall not constitute termination of employment. The aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the time an Option is granted) of the stock with respect to which an Incentive Stock Option is exercisable for the first time during any calendar year (under all option plans of the Company and its subsidiary corporations) shall not exceed $100,000 per participant.

Section 9. Nonqualified Stock Options.

Nonqualified Stock Options shall consist of nonqualified options to purchase shares of Stock at purchase prices determined by the Committee but not less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares of Stock on the date of grant of the Option. The purchase price may be paid by check or, in the discretion of the Committee, by the delivery of shares of Stock then owned by the Participant. The Committee shall determine the vesting and forfeiture provisions of the Nonqualified Stock Options and shall set forth such terms in the Award Agreement. Unless determined otherwise in the Award Agreement, all Options shall terminate three months after termination of employment or service for any reason other than death, Retirement or Disability. Unless determined otherwise in the Award Agreements, in the event termination of employment or service occurs as a result of death, Retirement or Disability, such an Option will terminate 12 months after such termination provided however, if the optionee dies within 12 months after termination of employment or service by Retirement or Disability, then the period of exercise following death shall be three months. In no event shall any Option be exercised more than ten years after its date of grant. Leaves of absence granted to Employees by the Company or leaves of absence taken by Directors for military service, illness, and transfers of employment between the Company and any subsidiary thereof, as applicable, shall not constitute termination of employment or service. The Committee shall have the right to determine at the time the Option is granted whether shares issued upon exercise of a Nonqualified Stock Option shall be subject to other restrictions, and if so, the nature of the restrictions.

Section 10. Stock Appreciation Rights.

Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted which, at the discretion of the Committee, may be exercised (1) in lieu of exercise of an Option, or (2) independent of an Option. If the Option referred to in (1) or (2) above qualified as an Incentive Stock Option pursuant to Section 422 of the Code, the related SAR shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Code and the regulations issued thereunder. The Base Price or grant price of each SAR shall equal the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the date of grant of the SAR. At the time of grant, the Committee may establish, in its sole discretion, any other conditions on exercise of an SAR. At the discretion of the Committee, payment for SARs may be made in cash or Stock, or in a combination thereof. The following will apply upon exercise of an SAR:

(a)

Exercise of SARs in Lieu of Exercise of Options. SARs exercisable in lieu of Options may be exercised for all or part of the shares of Stock subject to the related Option upon the exercise of the right to exercise an equivalent number of Options. A SAR may be

A-5

exercised only with respect to the shares of Stock for which its related Option is then exercisable. Upon exercise of a SAR in lieu of exercise of an Option, shares of Stock equal to the number of SARs exercised shall no longer be available for exercise under the related Option (and when a share of Stock is purchased under the related Option, the related SAR shall similarly no longer be available for exercise).

(b)

Exercise of SARs Independent of Options. SARs exercisable independent of Options may be exercised upon whatever terms and conditions the Committee, in its sole discretion, imposes upon the SARs.

Section 11. Restricted Stock.

Restricted Stock shall consist of Stock issued or transferred under the Plan (other than upon exercise of Options or as Performance Awards) at any purchase price less than the Fair Market Value thereof on the date of issuance or transfer, or as a bonus. In the case of any Restricted Stock:

(a)

The purchase price, if any, will be determined by the Committee.

(b)

Restricted Stock may be subject to (i) restrictions on the sale or other disposition thereof; (ii) rights of the Company to reacquire such Restricted Stock at the purchase price, if any, originally paid therefor upon termination of the Employee’s employment or Director’s service within specified periods, (iii) representation by the Employee or Director that he or she intends to acquire Restricted Stock for investment and not for resale, and (iv) such other restrictions, conditions and terms as the Committee deems appropriate.

(c)

The Participant shall be entitled to all dividends paid with respect to Restricted Stock during the Period of Restriction and shall not be required to return any such dividends to the Company in the event of the forfeiture of the Restricted Stock.

(d)

The Participant shall be entitled to vote the Restricted Stock during the Period of Restriction.

(e)

The Committee shall determine whether Restricted Stock is to be delivered to the Participant with an appropriate legend imprinted on the certificate or if the shares are to be deposited in escrow pending removal of the restrictions.

Section 12. Performance Awards.

Performance Awards shall consist of Stock, stock units, cash based units or a combination thereof, to be issued without any payment therefor, in the event that certain performance goals established by the Committee are achieved during the Performance Period. The goals established by the Committee may be based upon company-wide performance or upon operating unit performance or a combination thereof and may include return on average total capital employed, earnings per share, return on shareholders’ equity, market share, growth in Broadcast Cash Flow, growth in Broadcast Cash Flow Less Cash Corporate Expenses, growth in EBITDA, growth in total revenue and/or specified components of total revenue, reduction in or the limitation in the growth of specified operating expenses, attainment of and/or maintenance of specified operating margins, attainment of and/or maintenance of specified weighted average costs of debt, attainment of and/or maintenance of specified weighted costs of capital, operating income (loss), income (loss) from continuing operations, pretax income from continuing operations, and, for a Performance Award that the Committee determines shall not be designed to comply with the Performance Based Exception, such other goals as may be established by the Committee. Unless and until the Committee determines that a Performance Award to a Covered Employee shall not be

A-6

designed to comply with the Performance-Based Exception, any performance goal related to a Performance Award must be established in writing by the Committee at a time when ~~you access~~ the ~~web site~~outcome of the performance goal is substantially uncertain and ~~follow~~not later than the ~~instructions~~earlier of (1) 90 days after the commencement of the period of service to ~~obtain your records~~which the performance goal relates or (2) 25 percent of the period of service to which the performance goal relates has elapsed. In the event the minimum corporate goal is not achieved at the conclusion of the Performance Period, no payment shall be made to the Participant. Actual payment of the Performance Award earned shall be a single sum and in cash or in Stock or in a combination of both, as the Committee in its sole discretion determines. If Stock is used, the Participant shall not have the right to vote and receive dividends until the goals are achieved and the actual shares are issued. In the event a Performance Award of stock units is paid in cash instead of Stock, the number of shares reserved for issuance hereunder and the number of shares which may be granted in the form of Performance Awards shall be reduced as if shares had been issued.The Committee shall certify in writing that any performance goals and any other material terms of a Performance Award have been achieved prior to the actual payment of the Performance Award. All Performance Awards shall be paid in full to the Participant no later than the 15th day of the third month following the end of the first calendar year in which the Performance Period ends or such Awards are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

Section 13. Adjustment Provisions.

In the event of any change in corporate capitalization, such as a stock split, stock dividend or reclassification, or a corporate transaction, such as any merger, consolidation, separation, including a spin-off, or other distribution of stock or property of the Company, any reorganization (whether or not such reorganization comes within the definition of such term in Code Section 368) or any partial or complete liquidation of the Company, such adjustment shall be made in the number and class of Stock which may be delivered under Section 4, in the number and class of and/or price of Shares subject to outstanding Awards granted under the Plan, and in the Award limits set forth in Section 4 as may be determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Committee, in its sole discretion, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights; provided, however, that the number of shares of Stock subject to any Award shall always be a whole number. The Committee shall not make any adjustment pursuant to this Section 13 that would cause an Award that is otherwise exempt from Code Section 409A to become subject to Section 409A; or that would cause an Award that is subject to Code Section 409A to fail to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 409A.

Section 14. Change of Control.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, upon a Change of Control, the Committee may make such adjustments with respect to Awards and take such other action as it deems advisable, including, without limitation, the substitution of new Awards, or the adjustment of outstanding Awards, or the termination of outstanding Awards, the acceleration of Awards, the removal of restrictions on outstanding Awards, or the termination of outstanding Awards in exchange for the cash value determined in good faith by the Committee of the vested and/or unvested portion of the Award. Any adjustment pursuant to this Section 14 may provide, in the Committee’s discretion, for the elimination without payment therefore of any fractional shares that might otherwise become subject to any Award, but except as set forth in this Section 14 may not otherwise diminish the then value of the Award. The foregoing adjustment and the manner of application of the foregoing provisions shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion and to ~~create~~the extent permitted under Section 409A of the Code and the regulations thereunder.

For purposes of this Plan, a “Change of Control” shall occur if (i) any Person (other than the Company or a Permitted Holder) is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under

A-7

the Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company which represent forty-five percent (45%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; (ii) during any period of two (2) consecutive years individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, unless the election, or the nomination for election, by the Company’s shareholders, of each new director is approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who were directors at the beginning of the period but excluding any individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of either an ~~electronic~~actual or threatened election contest (as such term is used in Rule 14a-11 of Regulation 14A promulgated under the Act) or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a person other than the Board; (iii) there is consummated any consolidation or merger of the Company in which the Company is not the continuing or surviving corporation or pursuant to which shares of the Company’s Stock are converted into cash, securities, or other property, other than a merger of the Company in which the holders of the Company’s Stock immediately prior to the merger have the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger; (iv) there is consummated any consolidation or merger of the Company in which the Company is the continuing or surviving corporation in which the holders of the Company’s Stock immediately prior to the merger do not own fifty-one percent (51%) or more of the combined voting ~~instruction form.~~

~~ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS~~
~~If you would like~~power of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger; (v) there is consummated any sale, lease, exchange, or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all, or substantially all, of the assets of the Company, or (vi) the shareholders of the Company approve any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company. For purposes of the above definition, a “Permitted Holder” means (i) each of J. Mack Robinson and Robert S. Prather, Jr.; (ii) their spouses and lineal descendants; (iii) in the event of the incompetence or death or any of the Persons described in clauses (i) and (ii), such Person’s estate, executor, administrator, committee and other personal representative; (iv) any trusts created for the benefit of the Persons described in clause (i) or (ii); (v) any person controlled by any of the Persons described in clause (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv); or (vi) any group of Persons (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) in which the Persons described in clauses (i) — (v), individually or collectively, control such group. For purposes of this definition, “control,” as used with respect to any Person, shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such Person, whether through ownership of voting securities or by agreement or otherwise.

Section 15. Nontransferability.

Each Award granted under the Plan to a Participant shall not be transferable otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and shall be exercisable, during the Participant’s lifetime, only by the Participant. In the event of the death of a Participant, exercise of payment shall be made only:

(a)

By or to the executor or administrator of the estate of the deceased Participant or the person or persons to whom the deceased Participant’s rights under the Award shall pass by will or the laws of descent and distribution; and

(b)

To the extent that the deceased Participant was entitled thereto at the date of his death, provided, however, that any otherwise applicable six-month holding period shall not be required for exercise by or payment to an executor or administrator of the estate of a deceased Reporting Person.

Section 16. Withholding.

The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy Federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign,

A-8

required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of this Plan.

With respect to withholding required upon the exercise of Options or SARs, upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock, or upon any other taxable event arising as a result of Awards granted hereunder, Participants may elect, subject to the approval of the Committee, to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having the Company withhold Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to the minimum statutory total tax which could be imposed on the transaction. All such elections shall be irrevocable, made in writing, signed by the Participant, and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.

Section 17. No Right to Employment or Service

A Participant’s right, if any, to continue to serve the Company and its subsidiaries as an Employee or Director or otherwise, shall not be enlarged or otherwise affected by his or her designation as a Participant under the Plan.

Section 18. Amendment of the Plan

The Board of Directors may amend the Plan from time to time or terminate the Plan at any time. However, no action authorized by this paragraph shall reduce the amount of any existing Award or change the terms and conditions thereof without the Participant’s consent except as specifically provided herein under Sections 13 and 14 or as otherwise required by law. Except for adjustments in accordance with Section 13, no amendment of the Plan or other similar actions, shall, without approval of the shareholders of the Company (a) increase the total number of shares which may be issued under the Plan or increase the amount of type of Awards that may be granted under the Plan; (b) change the minimum purchase price, if any, of shares of Stock which may be made subject to Awards under the Plan; or (c) modify the requirements as to eligibility for Awards under the Plan. No Award shall be granted more than ten years after the effective date of the Plan. Except in connection with a corporate transaction or event described in Section 13 of this Plan, the terms of outstanding Awards may not be amended to reduce the ~~costs incurred~~Base Price, or cancel outstanding Options or Stock Appreciation Rights in exchange for cash, other Awards or Options or Stock Appreciation Rights with a Base Price that is less than the Base Price of the original Options or Base Price of the original Stock Appreciation Rights, as applicable, without shareholder approval. The foregoing sentence is intended to prohibit the repricing of “underwater” Options and Stock Appreciation Rights and will not be construed to prohibit the adjustments provided for in Section 13 of this Plan.

Section 19. Securities Requirements

With respect to insiders, transactions under this Plan are intended to comply with all applicable conditions or Rule 16b-3 or its successors under the 1934 Act. To the extent any provision of the plan or action by ~~Gray Television, Inc.~~the Board or Committee fails to so comply, it shall be deemed null and void, to the extent permitted by law and deemed advisable by the Board or Committee.

The Committee may suspend the exercise or payment of any Award so long as it determines that securities exchange listing or registration or qualification under any securities laws is required in ~~mailing proxy materials, you can consent~~connection therewith and has not been completed on terms acceptable to ~~receiving~~the Committee.

A-9

Section 20. Effective Date of Plan and Shareholder Approval.

The Plan shall be effective on May 2, 2007, provided the approval of the shareholders of the Company is obtained. If the shareholders do not approve the Plan, the Plan shall not go into effect and no Awards shall be made under the Plan.

Section 21. Governing Law.

Except to the extent preempted by any applicable federal law, the Plan will be construed and administered in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia, without reference to the principles of conflicts of law. All Incentive Stock Options to be granted hereunder are intended to comply with Code Section 422, and all ~~future proxy statements, proxy cards~~provisions of the Plan and ~~annual reports electronically via e-mail~~all Incentive Stock Options granted hereunder must be construed in such manner as to effectuate that intent. All Awards to be granted hereunder are intended to comply with the exemptions or deferred compensation requirements of Code Section 409A, and all provisions of the ~~Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above~~Plan and all Awards granted hereunder must be construed in such a manner as to ~~vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate~~effectuate that ~~you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.~~

~~VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903~~
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

~~VOTE BY MAIL~~
~~Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Gray Television, Inc., c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.~~

intent.

A-10

GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

4370 PEACHTREE ROAD, N.E.

ATLANTA, GA 30319

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Gray Television, Inc. in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

~~GRAY TELEVISION, INC.~~

~~For~~

~~Withhold~~

~~For All~~

~~To withhold authority to vote for any individual~~

~~The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the following:~~

~~All~~

~~Except~~

~~nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the~~

~~number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.~~

~~Vote on Directors~~

~~Election of Directors~~

~~Nominees:~~

01) Richard L. Boger 07) Howell W. Newton

02) Ray M. Deaver 08) Hugh E. Norton

03) T. L. Elder 09) Robert S. Prather, Jr.

04) Hilton H. Howell, Jr. 10) Harriett J. Robinson

05) William E. Mayher, III 11) J. Mack Robinson

06) Zell B. Miller


~~NOTE~~~~: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.~~


~~For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.~~		o

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.




~~Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]~~	~~Date~~	~~Signature (Joint Owners)~~	~~Date~~

GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:

For

All

Withhold

All

For All

Except

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.

1. Election of Directors

Nominees

01)

Richard L. Boger

06)

William E. Mayher, III

02)

Ray M. Deaver

07)

Howell W. Newton

03)

T. L. Elder

08)

Hugh E. Norton

04)

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

09)

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

05)

Robin R. Howell

10)

Harriett J. Robinson

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3:

For

Against

Abstain

2. To approve amendments to the Gray Television, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan.

3. To ratify the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for 2012.

NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

For address change/comments, mark here.

(see reverse for instructions)

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the ~~Annual Meeting:~~
Shareholder Meeting To Be

Held on May 30, 2012:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

M46303-P23548-Z57378

~~M23650-P95657~~

PROXY
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS

GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

The ~~shareholder~~undersigned hereby appoints William E. Mayher, III and Hilton H. Howell, Jr. ~~or either~~and each of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies ~~each with the power to appoint his substitute,~~and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as ~~designated~~provided on the ~~reverse~~other side of this ballot, all of the shares of common stock and Class A common stock of Gray Television, Inc. that the ~~shareholder~~undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Gray Television, Inc. to be held ~~at 9:~~May 30, ~~a.m., local time, June 23, 2010,~~2012, at The Peachtree Insurance Center, The Executive Board Room, 5th Floor, 4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319 and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED ASIN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE ~~SHAREHOLDER.~~UNDERSIGNED. IF NO ~~SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE~~DIRECTION IS MADE BUT THE CARD IS SIGNED, THIS PROXY CARD WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES UNDER PROPOSAL 1, FOR PROPOSAL 2 AND FOR PROPOSAL 3 AND IN THE ~~NOMINEES LISTED ON~~DISCRETION OF THE ~~REVERSE SIDE FOR~~PROXIES WITH RESPECT TO SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ~~BOARD OF DIRECTORS.~~

MEETING.

~~Address Changes/Comments:~~



		Address change/comments:

(If you noted any Address ~~Changes/~~Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

Continued and to be signed on reverse side

o
¨		Preliminary Proxy Statement
o
¨		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule ~~14a-~~~~6(e)~~14a-6(e)(2))
þ
x		Definitive Proxy Statement
o
¨		Definitive Additional Materials
o
¨		Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

þ
Gray Television, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x		No fee required.
o
¨		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

o
¨		Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o¨		Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.


~~NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS~~
~~PROXY STATEMENT~~
~~VOTING REQUIREMENTS~~
~~PROPOSAL NUMBER 1~~ ~~ELECTION OF DIRECTORS~~
~~CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~
~~BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEMBERSHIP~~
~~BENEFICIAL SHARE OWNERSHIP~~
~~EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~
~~REPORT OF MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL COMMITTEE~~
~~COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION~~
~~CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS~~
~~SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE~~
~~REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE~~
~~INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~
~~EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION~~
~~OTHER MATTERS~~
~~SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR INCLUSION~~ ~~IN NEXT YEAR’S PROXY STATEMENT~~
~~OTHER SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR PRESENTATION~~ ~~AT NEXT YEAR’S ANNUAL MEETING~~
~~AVAILABILITY OF FORM 10-K~~
~~HOUSEHOLDING~~


	(1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:




(2)		Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:




(3)		Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):




(4)		Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:




(5)		Total fee paid:


	(1)		Amount Previously Paid:




(2)		Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:




(3)		Filing Party:




(4)		Date Filed:

	•	1.	The election of ~~eleven~~ten members of ~~our~~Gray Television, Inc.’s Board of Directors; ~~and~~


	By Order of the Board of Directors,
	Hilton H. Howell, Jr.
	Chief Executive Officer

	•		~~attending the 2010 Annual Meeting and voting in person;~~

	•		~~voting by Internet athttp://www.proxyvote.com~~;

	•		~~voting by telephone at 1-800-690-6903 as directed on the enclosed proxy card; or~~

	•		~~completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card.~~

	•		~~Notice of Annual Meeting;~~

	•		~~Proxy Statement;~~

	•		~~2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K; and~~

	•		~~Form of Proxy.~~


	Director
Name	Since	Age	Position

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.	1993	48	Director, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
William E. Mayher, III	1990	71	Chairman of the Board of Directors
Robert S. Prather, Jr.	1993	65	Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
J. Mack Robinson	1993	86	Director and Chairman Emeritus
Richard L. Boger	1991	63	Director
Ray M. Deaver	2002	69	Director
T. L. Elder	2003	71	Director
Zell B. Miller	2005	78	Director
Howell W. Newton	1991	63	Director
Hugh E. Norton	1987	77	Director
Harriett J. Robinson	1997	79	Director


Name	Director Since	Age	Position
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.	1993	50	Director, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
William E. Mayher, III	1990	73	Chairman of the Board of Directors
Robert S. Prather, Jr.	1993	67	Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
Richard L. Boger	1991	65	Director
Ray M. Deaver	2002	71	Director
T. L. Elder	2003	73	Director
Robin R. Howell	(1)	47	Director Nominee
Howell W. Newton	1991	65	Director
Hugh E. Norton	1987	79	Director
Harriett J. Robinson	1997	81	Director


Nonemployee Director or Director Nominee	Dollar Value ($)		Number of Shares of Restricted Stock (1) (#)
William E. Mayher, III		40,000		20,101
Richard L. Boger		40,000		20,101
Ray M. Deaver		40,000		20,101
T. L. Elder		40,000		20,101
Robin R. Howell		40,000		20,101
Howell W. Newton		40,000		20,101
Hugh E. Norton		40,000		20,101
Harriett J. Robinson		40,000		20,101
J. Mack Robinson		40,000		20,101


Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (in thousands) (#)			Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in 1st column) (in thousands) (#)
Common Stock:
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		1,002	(1)	$	7.50		7,383	(1)(2)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		$	—		—

Total		1,002					7,383

Class A Common Stock:
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		—	(1)	$	—		1,000	(1)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		$	—		—

Total		—					1,000


											Combined
											Voting
	Class A										Percent of
	Common Stock					Common Stock					Common
	Beneficially Owned					Beneficially Owned					and Class A
	(GTN.A)					(GTN)					Common
Name	Shares		Percent			Shares		Percent			Stock

Robert A. Beizer		—		*			16,181		*			*
Richard L. Boger		3,736		*			44,941		*			*
Ray M. Deaver		—		*			327,696		*			*
T. L. Elder		2,000		*			21,000		*			*
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.(1)(2)		681,550		11.8	%		481,283		1.1	%		7.3	%
William E. Mayher, III		13,500		*			139,750		*			*
Zell B. Miller		—		*			20,500		*			*
Howell W . Newton		2,625		*			25,225		*			*
Hugh E. Norton		13,500		*			39,750		*			*
Robert S. Prather, Jr.(3)		66,070		1.1	%		905,920		2.1			1.6	%
Harriett J. Robinson(2)(4)(5)		3,727,344		64.8	%		1,569,818		3.7	%		38.7	%
J. Mack Robinson(2)(5)(6)		3,727,344		64.8	%		1,569,818		3.7	%		38.7	%
James C. Ryan(7)		—		*			123,354		*			*
Mario J. Gabelli(8)		238,275		4.1	%		2,536,675		5.9	%		4.9	%
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(9)		—		*			2,612,833		6.1	%		2.6	%
FMR LLC(10)		—		*			4,858,397		11.3	%		4.8	%
All directors and executive officers as a group(11) (13 persons)		3,954,720		68.7	%		3,441,548		7.9	%		42.4	%


	Executive
	Officer
Name	Since	Age	Position

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.	2000	48	Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Robert S. Prather, Jr.	1996	65	President and Chief Operating Officer
James C. Ryan	1998	49	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Robert A. Beizer	1996	70	Vice President for Law and Development and Secretary


Name	Incentive Payment For Exceeding
Name	Revenue (net of agency commissions) Goal ($)		NOP Goal ($)		Broadcast Cash Flow Goal ($)		Total Incentive Payment ($)		Total Incentive Payment as a Percentage of Base Salary (%)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		86,696		112,249		214,236		413,181		82.6	%
Robert S. Prather, Jr.		96,088		124,410		237,444		457,942		48.2	%
James C. Ryan		32,511		42,093		80,339		154,943		41.3	%
Robert A. Beizer		30,344		39,287		74,982		144,613		41.3	%

		245,639		318,039		607,001		1,170,679


											Change in
											Pension
											Value and
											Nonqualified
											Deferred
							Stock		Option		Compensation		All Other
Name and			Salary(2)		Bonus(3)		Awards(4)		Awards(5)		Earnings(6)		Compensation(7)		Total
Principal Position	Year		($)		($)		($)		($)		($)		($)		($)

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		2009		400,000		—		—		—		14,839		59,387		474,226
Vice Chairman, Chief		2008		170,765		—		24,700		36,000		16,321		65,174		312,960
Executive Officer		2007		125,000		100,000		36,650		—		8,364		59,405		329,419
and Director(1)

Robert S. Prather, Jr.		2009		950,000		—		—		—		43,406		103,934		1,097,340
President,		2008		950,000		—		24,700		900,000		47,056		114,294		2,036,050
Chief Operating		2007		900,000		900,000		36,650		—		34,063		106,923		1,977,636
Officer and Director

James C. Ryan		2009		350,000		—		—		—		14,227		13,571		377,798
Senior Vice President		2008		350,000		—		—		135,000		27,442		20,010		532,452
and Chief Financial		2007		325,000		265,000		—		—		15,897		13,470		619,367
Officer

Robert A. Beizer		2009		320,000		35,000		—		—		17,939		33,792		406,731
Vice President-Law		2008		320,000		—		—		—		32,706		28,078		380,784
and Development		2007		315,000		30,000		—		—		22,944		24,749		392,693
and Secretary


							Company
			Dividends				Contributions		Company
			Paid on		Discounted		to Defined		Paid
			Stock		Securities		Contribution		Insurance		Directors’
			Awards(1)		Purchases(2)		Plans(3)		Premiums(4)		Fees(5)		Total
Name	Year		($)		($)		($)		($)		($)		($)

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		2009		—		1,832		—		7,555		50,000		59,387
		2008		1,890		3,825		6,623		2,836		50,000		65,174
		2007		1,920		3,825		5,625		1,035		47,000		59,405

Robert S. Prather, Jr.		2009		—		2,978		—		50,956		50,000		103,934
		2008		25,290		3,825		3,840		31,339		50,000		114,294
		2007		33,120		3,825		3,557		19,421		47,000		106,923

James C. Ryan		2009		—		—		—		13,571		—		13,571
		2008		—		—		7,750		12,260		—		20,010
		2007		—		—		7,750		5,720		—		13,470

Robert A. Beizer		2009		—		—		—		33,792		—		33,792
		2008		—		—		5,247		22,831		—		28,078
		2007		—		—		6,736		18,013		—		24,749


	Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying		Exercise or Base Price of Option		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and
Name	Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Threshold (#)		Target (#)		Maximum (#)		or Units (#)		Options (#)		Awards ($/Sh)		Option Awards
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		150,000		300,000		450,000		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Robert S. Prather, Jr.		166,250		332,500		498,750		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
James C. Ryan		56,250		112,500		168,750		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Robert A. Beizer		52,500		105,000		157,500		—		—		—		—		—		—		—


			Option Awards				Stock Awards
			Number				Number
			of Shares		Value		of Shares		Value
			Acquired		Realized		Acquired		Realized
	Class		on Exercise		on Exercise		on Vesting		on Vesting
Name	of Stock		(#)		($)		(#)		($)

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.(1)	Common			—		—		3,000		4,530

Robert S. Prather, Jr.(1)	Common			—		—		3,000		4,530

James C. Ryan		—		—		—		—		—

Robert A. Beizer		—		—		—		—		—


	Involuntary						Voluntary		Change of
	Termination(1)(2)		Death(1)(3)		Disability(1)(4)		Termination(1)(2)		Control(1)(5)
Name	($)		($)		($)		($)		($)

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		70,358		1,051,932		1,321,418		70,358		79,418
Robert S. Prather, Jr.		289,814		2,181,371		1,250,190		289,814		298,874
James C. Ryan		190,244		1,936,334		1,324,244		190,244		190,244
Robert A. Beizer		20,192		902,934		92,442		20,192		20,192


					Number of securities remaining
	Number of securities to				available for future issuance
	be issued upon exercise				under equity compensation
	of outstanding options,		Weighted average		plans (excluding securities
	warrants and rights		exercise price of		reflected in 1st column)
	(in thousands)		outstanding options		(in thousands)
Plan Category	(#)		warrants and rights		(#)

Common Stock:
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)(2)		1,476	$	8.28		7,392

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—	$	—		—

Total		1,476				7,392


Class A Common Stock:
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)		—	$	—		1,000

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—	$	—		—

Total		—				1,000

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

~~M23649-P95657~~

M46302-P23548-Z57378

KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

~~DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY~~